From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/45] some writeback experiments Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:45:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20091007144502.GB8622@localhost> References: <20091007073818.318088777@intel.com> <20091007142632.GM17883@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Theodore Tso , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Chris Mason Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:17370 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752581AbZJGOp6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:45:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091007142632.GM17883@mit.edu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:26:32PM +0800, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:38:18PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > > The estimated writeback bandwidth is about 1/2 the real throughput > > for ext2/3/4 and btrfs; noticeable bigger than real throughput for NFS; and > > cannot be estimated at all for XFS. Very interesting.. > > Can you expand on what you mean here? Estimated write bandwidth of > what? And what are you comparing it against? Please refer to [PATCH 21/45] writeback: estimate bdi write bandwidth and patch 22, I have some numbers there :) > I'm having trouble understanding your note (which I'm guessing you > write fairly late at night? :-) Sorry - I wrote that when I got tired on debugging ;) Thanks, Fengguang