linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	jamie@shareable.org
Subject: Re: symlinks with permissions
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:46:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091026174631.GD7233@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091026173629.GB16861@fieldses.org>

On Mon 26-10-09 13:36:29, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:57:29AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Jan Kara (jack@suse.cz):
> > >   Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Sun 25-10-09 07:29:53, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > ...yes, they do exist, in /proc/self/fd/* . Unfortunately, their
> > > > permissions are not actually checked during open, resulting in
> > > > (obscure) security hole: if you have fd open for reading, you can
> > > > reopen it for write, even through unix permissions would not allow
> > > > that.
> > > > 
> > > > Now... I'd like to close the hole. One way would be to actually check
> > > > symlink permissions on open -- because those symlinks already have
> > > > correct permissions.
> > >   Hmm, I'm not sure I understand the problem. Symlink is just a file
> > > containing a path. So if you try to open a symlink, you will actually open
> > > a file to which the path points. So what security problem is here? Either
> > > you can open the file symlink points to for writing or you cannot...
> > >   Anyway, if you want to play with this,
> > > fs/proc/base.c:proc_pid_follow_link
> > >   is probably the function you are interested in.
> > 
> > The problem he's trying to address is that users may try to protect
> > a file by doing chmod 700 on the parent dir, but leave the file itself
> > accessible.  They don't realize that merely having a task with an open
> > fd to that file gives other users another path to the file.
> > 
> > Whether or not that's actually a problem is open to debate, but I think
> > he's right that many users aren't aware of it.
> 
> If /proc/self/fd/23 is a symlink to /home/me/privatedir/secret, then an
> open("proc/self/fd/23",...) still traverses the whole /home/.../secret
> path, and needs appropriate permissions at each step, doesn't it?
> 
> Probably I'm just terminally confused....
  That's what I'd think as well but it does not as I've just learned and
tested :) proc_pid_follow_link actually directly gives a dentry of the
target file without checking permissions on the way.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-26 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-25  6:29 symlinks with permissions Pavel Machek
2009-10-26 16:31 ` Jan Kara
2009-10-26 16:57   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-10-26 17:36     ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-10-26 17:46       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-10-26 17:57         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-10-25  9:36           ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-26 18:22             ` Trond Myklebust
2009-10-27  8:11               ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-27 10:27                 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-10-26 18:35             ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-10-28  4:15             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-28  8:16               ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-28 11:25                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-28 21:03                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-29  2:20                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-29 11:03                       ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-29 16:23                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-30 18:35                           ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-30 20:37                             ` Nick Bowler
2009-10-30 23:03                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-31  2:30                               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-10-28 16:34                 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-10-28 19:44                   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-10-28 21:06                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-26 18:02         ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-10-26 17:57       ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091026174631.GD7233@duck.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).