* [PATCH] Remove obsolete comment in fs.h
@ 2009-10-28 0:46 Andreas Gruenbacher
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andreas Gruenbacher @ 2009-10-28 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, Jan Blunck
This question was determined to be a bug which was fixed in
commit 4a3b0a49.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 2620a8c..071e1fe 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1629,8 +1629,6 @@ struct super_operations {
* specific deadlocks.
*
* Q: What is the difference between I_WILL_FREE and I_FREEING?
- * Q: igrab() only checks on (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE). Should it also check on
- * I_CLEAR? If not, why?
*/
#define I_DIRTY_SYNC 1
#define I_DIRTY_DATASYNC 2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-10-28 0:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-28 0:46 [PATCH] Remove obsolete comment in fs.h Andreas Gruenbacher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).