From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/27] ext2: Add ext2_sb_info mutex Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 18:25:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20091102172554.GH31511@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1257156307-24175-1-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de> <1257156307-24175-5-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de> <20091102102654.GG31511@one.firstfloor.org> <20091102165752.GF21750@bolzano.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Pekka Enberg , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Blunck Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091102165752.GF21750@bolzano.suse.de> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org > Right. I converted it to be a spinlock and unlock before calling > ext2_sync_super(). > > What do you think? Again didn't go through all the code paths, but it seems like a good approach. -Andi