From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ext2 filesystem
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:41:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091105124111.GC12770@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257156307-24175-6-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de>
On Mon 02-11-09 11:04:45, Jan Blunck wrote:
> The BKL is still used in ext2_put_super(), ext2_fill_super(), ext2_sync_fs()
> ext2_remount() and ext2_write_inode(). From these calls ext2_put_super(),
> ext2_fill_super() and ext2_remount() are protected against each other by
> the struct super_block s_umount rw semaphore. The call in ext2_write_inode()
> could only protect the modification of the ext2_sb_info through
> ext2_update_dynamic_rev() against concurrent ext2_sync_fs() or ext2_remount().
> ext2_fill_super() and ext2_put_super() can be left out because you need a
> valid filesystem reference in all three cases, which you do not have when
> you are one of these functions.
This is not quite true. Actually, ext2_sync_fs() is called also with
s_umount held (for reading) so it cannot race with any of the mounting /
umounting functions. But it should probably be guarded against running two
instances of ext2_sync_fs() in parallel.
Looking into the code, we probably have a race in ext2_write_inode that
two threads can write one inode in parallel. But that's a separe issue from
BKL removal.
Honza
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> index 057074e..8b51416 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
> * Assorted race fixes, rewrite of ext2_get_block() by Al Viro, 2000
> */
>
> -#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> #include <linux/time.h>
> #include <linux/highuid.h>
> #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> @@ -1400,13 +1399,11 @@ int ext2_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int do_sync)
> /* If this is the first large file
> * created, add a flag to the superblock.
> */
> - lock_kernel();
> mutex_lock(&EXT2_SB(sb)->s_mutex);
> ext2_update_dynamic_rev(sb);
> EXT2_SET_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
> EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE);
> mutex_unlock(&EXT2_SB(sb)->s_mutex);
> - unlock_kernel();
> ext2_write_super(sb);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
> index d610eb9..7e819ac 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
> #include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
> #include <linux/exportfs.h>
> -#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> #include <linux/vfs.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/mount.h>
> @@ -118,8 +117,6 @@ static void ext2_put_super (struct super_block * sb)
> int i;
> struct ext2_sb_info *sbi = EXT2_SB(sb);
>
> - lock_kernel();
> -
> if (sb->s_dirt && !(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
> ext2_sync_fs(sb, 1);
>
> @@ -143,8 +140,6 @@ static void ext2_put_super (struct super_block * sb)
> sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
> kfree(sbi->s_blockgroup_lock);
> kfree(sbi);
> -
> - unlock_kernel();
> }
>
> static struct kmem_cache * ext2_inode_cachep;
> @@ -750,8 +745,6 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> __le32 features;
> int err;
>
> - lock_kernel();
> -
> err = -ENOMEM;
> sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(*sbi), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!sbi)
> @@ -1077,7 +1070,6 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> ext2_warning(sb, __func__,
> "mounting ext3 filesystem as ext2");
> ext2_setup_super (sb, es, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);
> - unlock_kernel();
> return 0;
>
> cantfind_ext2:
> @@ -1102,7 +1094,6 @@ failed_sbi:
> kfree(sbi->s_blockgroup_lock);
> kfree(sbi);
> failed_unlock:
> - unlock_kernel();
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1140,7 +1131,6 @@ static int ext2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> {
> struct ext2_super_block *es = EXT2_SB(sb)->s_es;
>
> - lock_kernel();
> if (es->s_state & cpu_to_le16(EXT2_VALID_FS)) {
> ext2_debug("setting valid to 0\n");
> es->s_state &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT2_VALID_FS);
> @@ -1154,7 +1144,6 @@ static int ext2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> ext2_commit_super(sb, es);
> }
> sb->s_dirt = 0;
> - unlock_kernel();
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1181,7 +1170,6 @@ static int ext2_remount (struct super_block * sb, int * flags, char * data)
> unsigned long old_sb_flags;
> int err;
>
> - lock_kernel();
> mutex_lock(&sbi->s_mutex);
>
> /* Store the old options */
> @@ -1221,14 +1209,12 @@ static int ext2_remount (struct super_block * sb, int * flags, char * data)
> }
> if ((*flags & MS_RDONLY) == (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
> mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_mutex);
> - unlock_kernel();
> return 0;
> }
> if (*flags & MS_RDONLY) {
> if (le16_to_cpu(es->s_state) & EXT2_VALID_FS ||
> !(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT2_VALID_FS)) {
> mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_mutex);
> - unlock_kernel();
> return 0;
> }
> /*
> @@ -1258,7 +1244,6 @@ static int ext2_remount (struct super_block * sb, int * flags, char * data)
> }
> ext2_sync_super(sb, es);
> mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_mutex);
> - unlock_kernel();
> return 0;
> restore_opts:
> sbi->s_mount_opt = old_opts.s_mount_opt;
> @@ -1266,7 +1251,6 @@ restore_opts:
> sbi->s_resgid = old_opts.s_resgid;
> sb->s_flags = old_sb_flags;
> mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_mutex);
> - unlock_kernel();
> return err;
> }
>
> --
> 1.6.4.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-05 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-02 10:04 [PATCH 00/27] Push down BKL to the filesystems (v2) Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 01/27] BKL: Push down BKL from do_new_mount() to the filesystems get_sb/fill_super operation Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 17:11 ` Jan Blunck
2009-11-03 10:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-03 10:25 ` Jan Blunck
2009-11-03 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-03 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 02/27] BKL: Remove outdated comment and include Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 03/27] BKL: Remove BKL from simple_fill_super Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 04/27] ext2: Add ext2_sb_info mutex Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:26 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-02 16:57 ` Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 17:25 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 13:55 ` Jan Kara
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 05/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ext2 filesystem Jan Blunck
2009-11-05 12:41 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-11-05 13:06 ` Jan Blunck
2009-11-05 13:56 ` Jan Kara
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 06/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ext3 fill_super() Jan Blunck
2009-11-05 11:55 ` Jan Kara
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 07/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ext3_put_super() and ext3_remount() Jan Blunck
2009-11-05 11:56 ` Jan Kara
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 08/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ext4 filesystem Jan Blunck
2009-11-09 14:45 ` Theodore Tso
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 09/27] BKL: Remove BKL from 9p Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 10/27] BKL: Remove BKL from autofs4 Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 11:13 ` Ian Kent
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 11/27] BKL: Remove BKL from befs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 12/27] BKL: Remove BKL from btrfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 12:13 ` Chris Mason
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 13/27] BKL: Remove BKL from configfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 18:44 ` Joel Becker
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 14/27] BKL: Remove BKL from cramfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:46 ` Coly Li
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 15/27] BKL: Remove BKL from devpts Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 16/27] BKL: Remove BKL from efs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:47 ` Coly Li
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 17/27] BKL: Remove BKL from exofs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 18/27] BKL: Remove BKL from hostfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:04 ` [PATCH 19/27] BKL: Remove BKL from hugetlbfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 20/27] BKL: Remove BKL from minix Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:46 ` Coly Li
2009-11-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 21/27] BKL: Remove BKL from omfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-03 19:21 ` Bob Copeland
2009-11-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 22/27] BKL: Remove BKL from openpromfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 23/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ramfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 24/27] BKL: Remove BKL from romfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 25/27] BKL: Remove BKL from sysfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 16:44 ` Greg KH
2009-11-02 17:35 ` Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 19:58 ` Greg KH
2009-11-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 26/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ubifs Jan Blunck
2009-11-03 5:47 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-11-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 27/27] BKL: Remove BKL from xfs Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 11:29 ` [PATCH 00/27] Push down BKL to the filesystems (v2) Christian Borntraeger
2009-11-02 13:30 ` Jan Blunck
2009-11-02 15:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-11-02 15:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091105124111.GC12770@duck.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jblunck@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).