From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mount -o sync regression in 2.6.31
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:07:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113150719.9d31dde2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091113144727.575cf038@nehalam>
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:47:27 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> wrote:
> Okay the scenario is:
> 1. Mount floppy with ext2 filesystem in sync mode
> 2. Write to floppy
> 3. Prematurely eject floppy
> 4. Unmount floppy
I assume that by "prematurely eject", you mean that you waited until
the activity LED had turned off, then hit the button without typing
umount?
Really, I think ext2 is just wrong here. At unmount time it runs
ext2_sync_super(), which updates a few fields in the superblock and
tries to write them back.
But if the fs was mounted with `-osync' then the driver should be
operating synchronously, dammit! That means that any time any syscall
alters the filesystem's s_free_blocks_count, s_free_inodes_count or
s_wtime, the driver should write those fields back to the superblock
prior to returning from the syscall.
However that might be unreasonaly anal of us, because those fields
aren't terribly important. A fsck will whine and fix them up.
> This triggers this warning in 2.6.31 which did not occur in 2.6.30
hm, I wonder why that changed. The warning's been there for a while.
> [ 580.325447] floppy0: disk absent or changed during operation
> [ 580.325454] lost page write due to I/O error on fd0
> [ 580.958434] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 580.958437] WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:1152 mark_buffer_dirty+0x23/0x7d()
> [ 580.958440] Hardware name: System Product Name
> [ 580.958442] Modules linked in: hid_belkin binfmt_misc bridge stp llc kvm_intel kvm ipv6 video output pci_slot acpi_cpufreq cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_userspace psmouse pcspkr serio_raw rtc_cmos wmi evdev sg sr_mod cdrom usbhid mvsas pata_acpi pata_marvell ata_piix libsas ahci igb sky2 scsi_transport_sas dca e1000e floppy dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_snapshot dm_mod fuse
> [ 580.958475] Pid: 8340, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.30-rc6-bisect #12
> [ 580.958477] Call Trace:
> [ 580.958483] [<ffffffff80232ebb>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0xd9/0x10b
> [ 580.958489] [<ffffffff80270031>] ? find_get_pages_tag+0x41/0xdd
> [ 580.958494] [<ffffffff802782f0>] ? pagevec_lookup+0x17/0x1e
> [ 580.958498] [<ffffffff80279377>] ? truncate_inode_pages_range+0x21d/0x31d
> [ 580.958502] [<ffffffff80270db5>] ? wait_on_page_writeback_range+0xce/0x11b
> [ 580.958507] [<ffffffff80245037>] ? bit_waitqueue+0x10/0xa0
> [ 580.958510] [<ffffffff802be80d>] ? mark_buffer_dirty+0x23/0x7d
> [ 580.958515] [<ffffffff803003eb>] ? ext2_sync_super+0x39/0x55
> [ 580.958519] [<ffffffff8030079c>] ? ext2_put_super+0x34/0xc7
> [ 580.958524] [<ffffffff802a3174>] ? generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0xfd
> [ 580.958533] [<ffffffff802a3223>] ? kill_block_super+0x22/0x3a
> [ 580.958537] [<ffffffff802a3831>] ? deactivate_super+0x43/0x5a
> [ 580.958541] [<ffffffff802b56f9>] ? sys_umount+0x2d8/0x307
> [ 580.958546] [<ffffffff8020aeeb>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 580.958549] ---[ end trace ccbde6411acd243f ]---
> [ 580.958580] floppy0: disk absent or changed during operation
> [ 580.958587] lost page write due to I/O error on fd0
void mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(!buffer_uptodate(bh));
that's expected, I expect. And it's just a WARN_ON_ONCE() so it
won't be flooding logs. We could just delete it I suppose.
> Bisecting between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31-rc1 reduced it down to:
>
> 8f184f27300f66f6dcc8296c2dae7a1fbe8429c9 is first bad commit
> commit 8f184f27300f66f6dcc8296c2dae7a1fbe8429c9
> Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat May 16 06:24:36 2009 +0200
>
> tracing/stat: replace linked list by an rbtree for sorting
Current score:
git: 4,559
kernel developers: 0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091111123340.703f5c86@nehalam>
[not found] ` <200911112234.24180.elendil@planet.nl>
2009-11-13 22:47 ` Mount -o sync regression in 2.6.31 Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 23:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-11-13 23:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-17 0:04 ` [PATCH] ext2: clear uptodate flag on super block I/O error Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-17 2:08 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-17 17:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-14 13:18 ` Mount -o sync regression in 2.6.31 Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091113150719.9d31dde2.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).