linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Union mount of block devices?
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:16:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091116211636.GC13403@shell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cdbb57f0911130528r3504efe2y55eb2bb4ab748568@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andrea Gelmini wrote:
> Hi all,
>     sorry to bother the ml but I'm not able to find the answer via Google.
>     Quick answer: is it possibile to stack block devices as union
> mount? Something like /dev/sdb1 (ro) below /dev/sdc1 (rw)?
> 
>     Long story...
>     I've got a partition with the begin of the journal over a few bad
> blocks (by the way, it's NTFS but it doesn't matter), so it is not
>     possible to fix/replay journal, and so on.
>     I can dd/dd_rescue the partition to file/partition and fix/recover
> all, but I just need to suck some files, so it would be a lot
> easier/quicker
>     to stack a good partition (rw) over the bad one (ro).

The phrase "union mount" caught my eye, but it's not what you want. :)
Union mounts merge file systems at the namespace level, not the block
or byte level of individual files.

You can try something like this to get what you describe above:

* Create a file big enough to cover the bad blocks
* Turn it into a loop device
* Create a loop device out of the good portion of your original block
  device using the "-o <offset>" argument to losetup
* Use md or whatever to concatenate the two together

There will be annoying issues with headers and alignment.  If you can
find a userspace recovery tool, you'll probably be a lot better off.

-VAL

      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-16 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-13 13:28 Union mount of block devices? Andrea Gelmini
2009-11-16 21:16 ` Valerie Aurora [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091116211636.GC13403@shell \
    --to=vaurora@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrea.gelmini@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).