linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Linux-Kernel Mailinglist" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	jkacur@redhat.com, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@wil.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] Introduce noop_llseek()
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:05:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091120170547.GF20634@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258735245-25826-2-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de>

Jan Blunck wrote:
> The noop_llseek() is a llseek() operation that filesystems can use that
> don't want to support seeking (leave the file->f_pos untouched) but still
> want to let the syscall itself to succeed.

This is weird behaviour: if you want to allow llseek() to succeed but
don't really support seeking, why does the device even care about the
value of file->f_pos?

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-20 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-20 16:40 [PATCH 00/15] Remove BKL from default_llseek() and other issues (v2) Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 01/15] Introduce noop_llseek() Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 17:05   ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2009-11-20 17:11     ` Jan Blunck
2009-11-21 16:56       ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 02/15] osst: Use noop_llseek() instead of default_llseek() Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 17:09   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-20 17:25     ` Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 03/15] osst: Update ppos instead of using file->f_pos Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 17:13   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-20 17:16     ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 04/15] s390: tape_char should update " Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 05/15] flash_read should update ppos instead of file->f_pos Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 06/15] eeprom_read()/eeprom_write() " Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched_feat_write: Update " Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 08/15] airo: Use " Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 09/15] frv: remove "struct file *" argument from sysctl ->proc_handler Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 10/15] mISDN: Remove unnecessary test on f_pos Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 11/15] zcrypt: Use nonseekable_open() Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 12/15] rtc-m41t80: " Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 13/15] Do not fallback to default_llseek() when readdir() uses BKL Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 21:27   ` Jan Kara
2009-11-21 18:03   ` Anders Larsen
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 14/15] BKL: Remove BKL from default_llseek() Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 16:40 ` [PATCH 15/15] BKL: Update documentation on llseek( \b) Jan Blunck
2009-11-20 17:02   ` [PATCH 15/15] BKL: Update documentation on llseek(\b) Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091120170547.GF20634@shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jblunck@suse.de \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).