From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pavel@ucw.cz, miklos@szeredi.hu, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] vfs: plug some holes involving LAST_BIND symlinks and file bind mounts (try #5)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:49:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091123224948.GB5598@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091123173616.75c3f600@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Jeff Layton wrote:
> > check_path_accessible seems pretty horrible. If a process is running
> > inside of a subdirectory it doesn't have permissions to access, say
> > a chroot, /proc/self/fd/XXX becomes completely unusable.
> >
>
> Hmm...I have this in there:
>
> + /* are we at global root or root of namespace? */
> + if ((tdentry == root.dentry && vfsmnt == root.mnt) ||
> + vfsmnt->mnt_parent == vfsmnt)
> + break;
>
> ...In the case of a chroot, wouldn't "current->fs->root" point to the
> root of the process' namespace? Or am I misunderstanding what
> current->fs actually represents?
A process can run inside a subdirectory it doesn't have permissions to
access without that being a chroot.
It can also run inside a subdirectory that isn't accessible from it's
root, if that's how it was started - as well as having other
descriptors pointing to things outside its root.
It can also be passed file descriptors from outside it's root while
it's running.
Really, I think the /proc/PID/fd/N check should restrict the open to
the O_* limitations that were used to open fd N before, and not have
any connection to actual paths at the time of this check.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 17:41 [PATCH 0/3] vfs: plug some holes involving LAST_BIND symlinks and file bind mounts (try #5) Jeff Layton
2009-11-23 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] vfs: force reval of target when following LAST_BIND symlinks Jeff Layton
2009-11-23 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] vfs: force reval on dentry of bind mounted files on FS_REVAL_DOT filesystems Jeff Layton
2009-11-23 17:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] vfs: check path permissions on target of LAST_BIND symlinks Jeff Layton
2009-11-23 22:05 ` [PATCH 0/3] vfs: plug some holes involving LAST_BIND symlinks and file bind mounts (try #5) Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-23 22:36 ` Jeff Layton
2009-11-23 22:49 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2009-11-23 23:15 ` Jeff Layton
2009-11-23 23:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-24 0:34 ` Jeff Layton
2009-11-24 1:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-24 11:26 ` Jeff Layton
2009-11-24 11:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-11-24 12:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-24 12:59 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-11-30 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-30 19:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-24 13:13 ` Duane Griffin
2009-11-30 19:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-12-01 8:56 ` Duane Griffin
2009-12-16 12:31 ` Al Viro
2009-12-20 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-20 21:04 ` Al Viro
2009-12-20 21:06 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-20 21:23 ` Al Viro
2010-01-01 15:40 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-10 4:42 ` Al Viro
2009-12-01 13:15 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091123224948.GB5598@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).