From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: don't ignore return value from lock_rename
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:46:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091207214606.GA9807@fedora-virt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912060217.nB62H945020961@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
On Sat Dec 05, 2009 at 09:17:09PM -0500, Erez Zadok (ezk@cs.sunysb.edu) was quoted:
> Tyler/Dustin,
>
> Here's another patch: use return value from lock_rename() in
> ecryptfs_rename, and properly check that return value. I've tested it
> briefly with ecryptfs: moved some files/directories at both the same level,
> as well as into subdirectories which may share a common ancestor. Things
> seem to work, but perhaps more testing is needed.
>
> BTW, identical code to this has been running in Unionfs for a couple of
> years, so I'm reasonably confident that this patch is correct.
>
> diffstat:
> inode.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Cheers,
> Erez.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ecryptfs: don't ignore return value from lock_rename
>
> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Looks correct to me - thanks!
Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-2.6.git#next
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> index 429ca0b..e4dd0c6 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> @@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ ecryptfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> struct dentry *lower_new_dentry;
> struct dentry *lower_old_dir_dentry;
> struct dentry *lower_new_dir_dentry;
> + struct dentry *trap = NULL;
>
> lower_old_dentry = ecryptfs_dentry_to_lower(old_dentry);
> lower_new_dentry = ecryptfs_dentry_to_lower(new_dentry);
> @@ -621,7 +622,17 @@ ecryptfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> dget(lower_new_dentry);
> lower_old_dir_dentry = dget_parent(lower_old_dentry);
> lower_new_dir_dentry = dget_parent(lower_new_dentry);
> - lock_rename(lower_old_dir_dentry, lower_new_dir_dentry);
> + trap = lock_rename(lower_old_dir_dentry, lower_new_dir_dentry);
> + /* source should not be ancestor of target */
> + if (trap == lower_old_dentry) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_lock;
> + }
> + /* target should not be ancestor of source */
> + if (trap == lower_new_dentry) {
> + rc = -ENOTEMPTY;
> + goto out_lock;
> + }
> rc = vfs_rename(lower_old_dir_dentry->d_inode, lower_old_dentry,
> lower_new_dir_dentry->d_inode, lower_new_dentry);
> if (rc)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-07 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-06 2:17 [PATCH] ecryptfs: don't ignore return value from lock_rename Erez Zadok
2009-12-07 21:46 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091207214606.GA9807@fedora-virt \
--to=tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=kirkland@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox