From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: [patch 2/9] fs: Add missing rcu protection for __task_cred() in sys_ioprio_get Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:52:58 -0000 Message-ID: <20091210004703.067454615@linutronix.de> References: <20091210001308.247025548@linutronix.de> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Dipankar Sarma , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Al Viro , James Morris , David Howells , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: LKML Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline; filename=fs-fix-missing-rcu-protection-of-__task_cred.patch Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org sys_ioprio_get() accesses __task_cred() without being in a RCU read side critical section. tasklist_lock is not protecting that when CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y. Add a rcu_read_lock/unlock() section around the code which accesses __task_cred(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: David Howells Cc: James Morris Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Al Viro --- fs/ioprio.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Index: linux-2.6-tip/fs/ioprio.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/fs/ioprio.c +++ linux-2.6-tip/fs/ioprio.c @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(ioprio_get, int, which, if (!user) break; + rcu_read_lock(); do_each_thread(g, p) { if (__task_cred(p)->uid != user->uid) continue; @@ -241,6 +242,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(ioprio_get, int, which, else ret = ioprio_best(ret, tmpio); } while_each_thread(g, p); + rcu_read_unlock(); if (who) free_uid(user);