From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karel Zak Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: return -EAGAIN if the connection has not been init'ed Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:04:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20091216140403.GA1969@nb.net.home> References: <20091112210125.GE4920@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com> <1258118085.5040.46.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com> <20091120145608.GA29243@localhost.localdomain> <20091120192838.GA3601@nb.net.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: josef@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com, fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2707 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934011AbZLPOEb (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:04:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Karel Zak wrote: > > Yes, I think the option seems usable in some others cases too. I'll > > add this option to 2.17-rc2. > > Karel, thanks for adding this. > > One more request: could you please add the --no-canonicalize option to > umount(8) as well? OK. > Also I'm wondering whether it is a good idea to allow this for user > mounts/umounts, as is currently the case. Or should it be restricted > to root-only? Good point. Yes, it does not make sense for normal users. Karel -- Karel Zak