From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang
<fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Steve Rago <sar-a+KepyhlMvJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
<Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"jens.axboe" <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Staubach <staubach-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:43:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091223084302.GA14912@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091222123538.GB604-jyMamyUUXNJG4ohzP4jBZS1Fcj925eT/@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:35:39PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > nfsd_sync:
> > [take i_mutex]
> > filemap_fdatawrite => can also be blocked, but less a problem
> > [drop i_mutex]
> > filemap_fdatawait
> >
> > Maybe it's a dumb question, but what's the purpose of i_mutex here?
> > For correctness or to prevent livelock? I can imagine some livelock
> > problem here (current implementation can easily wait for extra
> > pages), however not too hard to fix.
> Generally, most filesystems take i_mutex during fsync to
> a) avoid all sorts of livelocking problems
> b) serialize fsyncs for one inode (mostly for simplicity)
> I don't see what advantage would it bring that we get rid of i_mutex
> for fdatawait - only that maybe writers could proceed while we are
> waiting but is that really the problem?
It would match what we do in vfs_fsync for the non-nfsd path, so it's
a no-brainer to do it. In fact I did switch it over to vfs_fsync a
while ago but that go reverted because it caused deadlocks for
nfsd_sync_dir which for some reason can't take the i_mutex (I'd have to
check the archives why).
Here's a RFC patch to make some more sense of the fsync callers in nfsd,
including fixing up the data write/wait calling conventions to match the
regular fsync path (which might make this a -stable candidate):
Index: linux-2.6/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/nfsd/vfs.c 2009-12-23 09:32:45.693170043 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/nfsd/vfs.c 2009-12-23 09:39:47.627170082 +0100
@@ -769,45 +769,27 @@ nfsd_close(struct file *filp)
}
/*
- * Sync a file
- * As this calls fsync (not fdatasync) there is no need for a write_inode
- * after it.
+ * Sync a directory to disk.
+ *
+ * This is odd compared to all other fsync callers because we
+ *
+ * a) do not have a file struct available
+ * b) expect to have i_mutex already held by the caller
*/
-static inline int nfsd_dosync(struct file *filp, struct dentry *dp,
- const struct file_operations *fop)
+int
+nfsd_sync_dir(struct dentry *dentry)
{
- struct inode *inode = dp->d_inode;
- int (*fsync) (struct file *, struct dentry *, int);
+ struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
int err;
- err = filemap_fdatawrite(inode->i_mapping);
- if (err == 0 && fop && (fsync = fop->fsync))
- err = fsync(filp, dp, 0);
- if (err == 0)
- err = filemap_fdatawait(inode->i_mapping);
+ WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&inode->i_mutex));
+ err = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
+ if (err == 0 && inode->i_fop->fsync)
+ err = inode->i_fop->fsync(NULL, dentry, 0);
return err;
}
-static int
-nfsd_sync(struct file *filp)
-{
- int err;
- struct inode *inode = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
- dprintk("nfsd: sync file %s\n", filp->f_path.dentry->d_name.name);
- mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
- err=nfsd_dosync(filp, filp->f_path.dentry, filp->f_op);
- mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
-
- return err;
-}
-
-int
-nfsd_sync_dir(struct dentry *dp)
-{
- return nfsd_dosync(NULL, dp, dp->d_inode->i_fop);
-}
-
/*
* Obtain the readahead parameters for the file
* specified by (dev, ino).
@@ -1011,7 +993,7 @@ static int wait_for_concurrent_writes(st
if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
dprintk("nfsd: write sync %d\n", task_pid_nr(current));
- err = nfsd_sync(file);
+ err = vfs_fsync(file, file->f_path.dentry, 0);
}
last_ino = inode->i_ino;
last_dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev;
@@ -1180,7 +1162,7 @@ nfsd_commit(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, stru
return err;
if (EX_ISSYNC(fhp->fh_export)) {
if (file->f_op && file->f_op->fsync) {
- err = nfserrno(nfsd_sync(file));
+ err = nfserrno(vfs_fsync(file, file->f_path.dentry, 0));
} else {
err = nfserr_notsupp;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-23 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1261015420.1947.54.camel@serenity>
[not found] ` <1261037877.27920.36.camel@laptop>
[not found] ` <20091219122033.GA11360@localhost>
[not found] ` <1261232747.1947.194.camel@serenity>
2009-12-22 1:59 ` [PATCH] improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads Wu Fengguang
2009-12-22 12:35 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20091222123538.GB604-jyMamyUUXNJG4ohzP4jBZS1Fcj925eT/@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-23 8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
[not found] ` <20091223084302.GA14912-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-23 13:32 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20091223133244.GB3159-+0h/O2h83AeN3ZZ/Hiejyg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-24 5:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-24 1:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-22 16:41 ` Steve Rago
2009-12-24 1:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-24 14:49 ` Steve Rago
2009-12-25 7:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-23 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-23 18:05 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20091223180551.GD3159-+0h/O2h83AeN3ZZ/Hiejyg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-23 19:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-24 2:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-24 12:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-25 5:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-30 16:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-31 5:04 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-31 19:13 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-06 3:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 16:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-06 18:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-06 18:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-06 18:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-06 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-06 19:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-06 19:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-06 20:09 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20100106200928.GB22781-+0h/O2h83AeN3ZZ/Hiejyg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 20:51 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <20100106205110.22547.85345.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 20:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] VM: Split out the accounting of unstable writes from BDI_RECLAIMABLE Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <20100106205110.22547.93554.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-07 1:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] VM/NFS: The VM must tell the filesystem when to free reclaimable pages Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 2:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-07 4:49 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 5:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-07 5:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 14:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 20:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] VM: Use per-bdi unstable accounting to improve use of wbc->force_commit Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <20100106205110.22547.32584.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-07 2:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 20:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] VM: Don't call bdi_stat(BDI_UNSTABLE) on non-nfs backing-devices Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 1:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 20:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] VFS: Ensure that writeback_single_inode() commits unstable writes Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <20100106205110.22547.17971.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 21:38 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20100106213843.GD22781-+0h/O2h83AeN3ZZ/Hiejyg@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 21:48 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 2:18 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <1262839082.2185.15.camel@localhost>
2010-01-07 4:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-07 4:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] Re: [PATCH] improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <20100107045330.5986.55090.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-07 4:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] VM: Don't call bdi_stat(BDI_UNSTABLE) on non-nfs backing-devices Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 4:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] NFS: Run COMMIT as an asynchronous RPC call when wbc->for_background is set Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 4:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] VM: Split out the accounting of unstable writes from BDI_RECLAIMABLE Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 4:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] VM/NFS: The VM must tell the filesystem when to free reclaimable pages Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 4:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] VFS: Ensure that writeback_single_inode() commits unstable writes Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] " Wu Fengguang
2010-01-07 15:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-08 1:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-08 1:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-08 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-08 9:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-08 13:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-08 13:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-08 14:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-06 20:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] NFS: Run COMMIT as an asynchronous RPC call when wbc->for_background is set Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <20100106205110.22547.31434.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-07 2:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 21:44 ` [PATCH 0/6] Re: [PATCH] improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads Jan Kara
2010-01-06 22:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-01-07 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091223084302.GA14912@infradead.org \
--to=hch-wegcikhe2lqwvfeawa7xhq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arjan-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sar-a+KepyhlMvJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=staubach-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).