linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Quentin Barnes <qbarnes+nfs@yahoo-inc.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v5] readahead: introduce O_RANDOM for POSIX_FADV_RANDOM
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:27:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100105032715.GA1044@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100105031801.GA591@localhost>

On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:18:01AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>  
> +/*
> + * usage of open(O_RANDOM) is disabled: __dentry_open() will nuke this bit
> + */
> +#ifndef O_RANDOM
> +#define O_RANDOM	0200000000	/* random access pattern hint */
> +#endif
> +

Tested with this program, output is

        flags=0x9001 O_SYNC=0x1000 O_RANDOM=0

My user space O_SYNC is still the old O_DSYNC. But should be OK to
test the sparc O_SYNC.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>

#define O_RANDOM       040000000       /* random access pattern hint */

int main (void)
{
	int fd, flags;

	fd = open("/tmp/fcntl-test",
		  O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_SYNC | O_RANDOM, 0666);
	flags = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL, 0);
	printf("flags=%#lx O_SYNC=%#lx O_RANDOM=%#lx\n",
	       flags, flags & O_SYNC, flags & O_RANDOM);
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks,
Fengguang

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-05  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20091225000717.GA26949@yahoo-inc.com>
     [not found] ` <87aax18xms.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
2009-12-30  5:15   ` [RFC][PATCH] Disabling read-ahead makes I/O of large reads small Wu Fengguang
2009-12-30  5:17     ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] readahead: replace ra->mmap_miss with ra->flags Wu Fengguang
2009-12-30  5:24     ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] readahead: avoid page-by-page reads on POSIX_FADV_RANDOM Wu Fengguang
2009-12-30 18:02       ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-31  1:39         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-31  2:53           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-31  3:03             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-12-31  4:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2] readahead: introduce O_RANDOM_READ for POSIX_FADV_RANDOM Wu Fengguang
2010-01-08 13:08           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-09 13:59             ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-09 14:01               ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-04  4:50         ` [RFC][PATCH v3] readahead: introduce O_RANDOM " Wu Fengguang
2010-01-04  5:17           ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-04  7:33             ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-04 12:56               ` [RFC][PATCH v4] " Wu Fengguang
2010-01-05  2:03                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-05  2:26                   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-05  2:28                     ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-05  2:45                       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-05  5:21                         ` Eric Paris
2010-01-05  3:18                       ` [RFC][PATCH v5] " Wu Fengguang
2010-01-05  3:27                         ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-01-04 16:50               ` [RFC][PATCH v3] " Quentin Barnes
2010-01-04 18:57                 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-01-04  5:20           ` Minchan Kim
2010-01-04 12:16             ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-05  1:46               ` Minchan Kim
2010-01-05  2:16                 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-05  3:40                   ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100105032715.GA1044@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=qbarnes+nfs@yahoo-inc.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).