linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] vfs: introduce FMODE_NEG_OFFSET for allowing negative f_pos
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:45:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100130094957.972297091@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100130094515.475881280@intel.com

[-- Attachment #1: f_pos-fix --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3728 bytes --]

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Now, rw_verify_area() checsk f_pos is negative or not. And if
negative, returns -EINVAL.

But, some special files as /dev/(k)mem and /proc/<pid>/mem etc..
has negative offsets. And we can't do any access via read/write
to the file(device).

So introduce FMODE_NEG_OFFSET to allow negative file offsets.

Changelog: v5->v6
 - use FMODE_NEG_OFFSET (suggested by Al)
 - rebased onto 2.6.33-rc1

Changelog: v4->v5
 - clean up patches dor /dev/mem.
 - rebased onto 2.6.32-rc1

Changelog: v3->v4
 - make changes in mem.c aligned.
 - change __negative_fpos_check() to return int. 
 - fixed bug in "pos" check.
 - added comments.

Changelog: v2->v3
 - fixed bug in rw_verify_area (it cannot be compiled)

CC: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
CC: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 drivers/char/mem.c |    4 ++++
 fs/proc/base.c     |    2 ++
 fs/read_write.c    |   21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/fs.h |    3 +++
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux-mm.orig/fs/read_write.c	2010-01-22 11:20:29.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-mm/fs/read_write.c	2010-01-30 17:41:51.000000000 +0800
@@ -205,6 +205,20 @@ bad:
 }
 #endif
 
+static int
+__negative_fpos_check(struct file *file, loff_t pos, size_t count)
+{
+	/*
+	 * pos or pos+count is negative here, check overflow.
+	 * too big "count" will be caught in rw_verify_area().
+	 */
+	if ((pos < 0) && (pos + count < pos))
+		return -EOVERFLOW;
+	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_NEG_OFFSET)
+		return 0;
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
 /*
  * rw_verify_area doesn't like huge counts. We limit
  * them to something that fits in "int" so that others
@@ -222,8 +236,11 @@ int rw_verify_area(int read_write, struc
 	if (unlikely((ssize_t) count < 0))
 		return retval;
 	pos = *ppos;
-	if (unlikely((pos < 0) || (loff_t) (pos + count) < 0))
-		return retval;
+	if (unlikely((pos < 0) || (loff_t) (pos + count) < 0)) {
+		retval = __negative_fpos_check(file, pos, count);
+		if (retval)
+			return retval;
+	}
 
 	if (unlikely(inode->i_flock && mandatory_lock(inode))) {
 		retval = locks_mandatory_area(
--- linux-mm.orig/include/linux/fs.h	2010-01-30 17:41:04.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-mm/include/linux/fs.h	2010-01-30 17:41:51.000000000 +0800
@@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
 /* File was opened by fanotify and shouldn't generate fanotify events */
 #define FMODE_NONOTIFY		((__force fmode_t)0x1000000)
 
+/* File is huge (eg. /dev/kmem): treat loff_t as unsigned */
+#define FMODE_NEG_OFFSET	((__force fmode_t)0x2000)
+
 /*
  * The below are the various read and write types that we support. Some of
  * them include behavioral modifiers that send information down to the
--- linux-mm.orig/drivers/char/mem.c	2010-01-30 17:23:31.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-mm/drivers/char/mem.c	2010-01-30 17:41:51.000000000 +0800
@@ -882,6 +882,10 @@ static int memory_open(struct inode *ino
 	if (dev->dev_info)
 		filp->f_mapping->backing_dev_info = dev->dev_info;
 
+	/* Is /dev/mem or /dev/kmem ? */
+	if (dev->dev_info == &directly_mappable_cdev_bdi)
+		filp->f_mode |= FMODE_NEG_OFFSET;
+
 	if (dev->fops->open)
 		return dev->fops->open(inode, filp);
 
--- linux-mm.orig/fs/proc/base.c	2010-01-30 17:14:14.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-mm/fs/proc/base.c	2010-01-30 17:41:51.000000000 +0800
@@ -880,6 +880,8 @@ static const struct file_operations proc
 static int mem_open(struct inode* inode, struct file* file)
 {
 	file->private_data = (void*)((long)current->self_exec_id);
+	/* OK to pass negative loff_t, we can catch out-of-range */
+	file->f_mode |= FMODE_NEG_OFFSET;
 	return 0;
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-30  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-30  9:45 [PATCH 0/5] [RESEND] FMODE_NONOTIFY and FMODE_NEG_OFFSET bits Wu Fengguang
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] fanotify: fix FMODE_NONOTIFY bit number Wu Fengguang
2010-02-01 20:44   ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT) Wu Fengguang
2010-02-01 20:48   ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 13:39     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-03 15:08       ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 15:15         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 15:42           ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 15:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 17:11               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-03 18:14             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-03 18:47               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 19:49                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:10                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-04 15:13                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-04 15:54                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-04 16:04                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-05 12:11                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-05 12:14                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-05 21:54                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-06  9:36                               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-07  1:55                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-08  9:28                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-08  9:35                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-08  9:59                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-11 17:24                                         ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-11 17:33                                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-12 17:06                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-12 17:28                                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-12 17:47                                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-12 19:05                                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-17 13:57                                                     ` Michal Marek
2010-02-17 17:20                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-17 17:31                                                         ` Michal Marek
2010-02-17 17:34                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-17 17:39                                                           ` Michal Marek
2010-02-18  6:19                                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 14:22                                                               ` [PATCH] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 16:06                                                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-19 16:45                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 16:53                                                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-22 14:17                                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-22 17:21                                                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-22 18:49                                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-22 19:55                                                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23  6:37                                                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 15:58                                                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 17:34                                                                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23 17:54                                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 18:17                                                                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23 19:06                                                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-26  5:27                                                                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-26  7:47                                                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-26 17:48                                                                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-27  8:28                                                                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-27 20:00                                                                                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-09 15:36                                                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 15:50                                                                                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09 16:23                                                                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 16:32                                                                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09 17:32                                                                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 17:37                                                                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-18 11:17                                                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-18 11:19                                                                                                   ` [PATCH 1/2] bitops: Optimize hweight() by making use of compile-time evaluation Borislav Petkov
2010-03-18 11:20                                                                                                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants Borislav Petkov
2010-02-18 10:51                                                       ` [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT) Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-18 11:51                                                         ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 10:12                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-14 11:24                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 12:23                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-14 14:19                                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 18:36                                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-14 20:28                                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 22:13                                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:16                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:39                     ` Brian Gerst
2010-02-03 17:10       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] vfs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check Wu Fengguang
2010-01-30  9:45 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] devmem: dont allow seek to last page Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100130094957.972297091@intel.com \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).