From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] %pd - for printing dentry name
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:34:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100201223410.GB12882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100201222511.GA12882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:25:11PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> There's a lot of places doing printks with ->d_name of various
> dentries. Unfortunately, as often as not they are b0rken due to races
> with rename().
>
> I propose to add a new format - %pd. It would print dentry name.
> However, unlike everything else in vsnprintf, it would NOT be locking-agnostic.
> It would grab and release dentry->d_lock. And yes, I hate that as much as
> anyone. I don't see any sane alternative.
>
> Patch below implements it and fixes some obvious races in ocfs2
> and ubifs by switch to that sucker. There are many more places of
> that kind and a _lot_ of those are racy. Adding ->d_lock in every caller
> is not a good solution, IMO...
>
> Rules are:
> * don't use %pd under dentry->d_lock, use dentry->d_name.name instead; in
> that case it *is* safe. Incidentally, ->d_lock isn't held a lot.
> * if we don't hold dentry->d_lock, feel free to use %pd....,dentry
>
> Comments?
PS: if it ends up going in, the usual S-o-b applies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-01 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 22:25 [PATCH][RFC] %pd - for printing dentry name Al Viro
2010-02-01 22:34 ` Al Viro [this message]
2010-02-01 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 23:18 ` Al Viro
2010-02-02 1:06 ` Al Viro
2010-02-02 5:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-02 17:01 ` Al Viro
2010-02-02 18:10 ` Olivier Galibert
2010-02-02 19:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-03 3:04 ` Al Viro
2010-02-04 4:53 ` Al Viro
2010-02-02 4:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-02 5:00 ` Al Viro
2010-02-02 6:36 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-04 6:02 ` Al Viro
2010-02-04 7:40 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-02 6:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-02-02 7:09 ` Al Viro
2010-02-02 13:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-02-02 15:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-02 16:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-02-02 16:43 ` Al Viro
2010-02-03 10:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-02-03 2:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-02-04 15:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-04 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-02-04 17:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-04 17:36 ` Al Viro
2010-02-07 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-02-01 22:45 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100201223410.GB12882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).