linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT)
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:36:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100206093659.GA28326@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6C93A2.1090302@zytor.com>

On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 01:54:42PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 04:11 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > +
> > +unsigned int __arch_hweight16(unsigned int w)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int res = 0;
> > +
> > +	asm volatile("xor %%dh, %%dh\n\t"
> > +		     __arch_hweight_alt(32)
> > +			: "=di" (res)
> > +			: "di" (w)
> > +			: "ecx", "memory");
> > +
> 
> This is wrong in more ways than I can shake a stick at.

Thanks for reviewing it though - how else would I learn :).

> a) "di" doesn't mean the DI register - it means the DX register (d) or
> an immediate (i).  Since you don't have any reference to either %0 or %1
> in your code, you have no way of knowing which one it is.  The
> constraint for the di register is "D".

right.

> b) On 32 bits, the first argument register is in %eax (with %edx used
> for the upper half of a 32-bit argument), but on 64 bits, the first
> argument is in %rdi, with the return still in %rax.

Sure, it is right there in arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h. Shame on me.

> c) You call a C function, but you don't clobber the set of registers
> that a C function would clobber.  You either need to put the function in
> an assembly wrapper (which is better in the long run), or clobber the
> full set of registers that is clobbered by a C function (which is better
> in the short term) -- which is eax, edx, ecx on 32 bits, but rax, rdi,
> esi, rdx, rcx, r8, r9, r10, r11 on 64 bits.

I think you mean rsi instead of esi here.

Well, the example Brian pointed me to - __mutex_fastpath_lock - lists
the full set of clobbered registers. Please elaborate on the assembly
wrapper for the function, wouldn't I need to list all the clobbered
registers there too or am I missing something?

> d) On the other hand, you do *not* need a "memory" clobber.

Right, in this case we have all non-barrier like inlines so no memory
clobber, according to the comment above alternative() macro.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

-
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating Systems Research Center

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-06  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-30  9:45 [PATCH 0/5] [RESEND] FMODE_NONOTIFY and FMODE_NEG_OFFSET bits Wu Fengguang
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] fanotify: fix FMODE_NONOTIFY bit number Wu Fengguang
2010-02-01 20:44   ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT) Wu Fengguang
2010-02-01 20:48   ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 13:39     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-03 15:08       ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 15:15         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 15:42           ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 15:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 17:11               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-03 18:14             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-03 18:47               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 19:49                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:10                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-04 15:13                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-04 15:54                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-04 16:04                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-05 12:11                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-05 12:14                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-05 21:54                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-06  9:36                               ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2010-02-07  1:55                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-08  9:28                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-08  9:35                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-08  9:59                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-11 17:24                                         ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-11 17:33                                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-12 17:06                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-12 17:28                                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-12 17:47                                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-12 19:05                                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-17 13:57                                                     ` Michal Marek
2010-02-17 17:20                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-17 17:31                                                         ` Michal Marek
2010-02-17 17:34                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-17 17:39                                                           ` Michal Marek
2010-02-18  6:19                                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 14:22                                                               ` [PATCH] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 16:06                                                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-19 16:45                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 16:53                                                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-22 14:17                                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-22 17:21                                                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-22 18:49                                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-22 19:55                                                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23  6:37                                                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 15:58                                                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 17:34                                                                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23 17:54                                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 18:17                                                                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23 19:06                                                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-26  5:27                                                                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-26  7:47                                                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-26 17:48                                                                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-27  8:28                                                                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-27 20:00                                                                                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-09 15:36                                                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 15:50                                                                                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09 16:23                                                                                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 16:32                                                                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09 17:32                                                                                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 17:37                                                                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-18 11:17                                                                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-18 11:19                                                                                                   ` [PATCH 1/2] bitops: Optimize hweight() by making use of compile-time evaluation Borislav Petkov
2010-03-18 11:20                                                                                                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants Borislav Petkov
2010-02-18 10:51                                                       ` [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT) Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-18 11:51                                                         ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 10:12                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-14 11:24                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 12:23                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-14 14:19                                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 18:36                                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-14 20:28                                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 22:13                                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:16                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:39                     ` Brian Gerst
2010-02-03 17:10       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] vfs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check Wu Fengguang
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] vfs: introduce FMODE_NEG_OFFSET for allowing negative f_pos Wu Fengguang
2010-01-30  9:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] devmem: dont allow seek to last page Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100206093659.GA28326@aftab \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).