From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: add NOFOLLOW flag to umount(2)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:21:00 -0500
Message-ID: <20100211172100.GA28533@infradead.org>
References: <E1NfAXx-0000ln-59@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eugene Teo <eugene@redhat.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@web.de>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1NfAXx-0000ln-59@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:15:53PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>  - renamed flag to UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW
>  - added UMOUNT_UNUSED for feature detection

Umm, why?  MNT_ certainly isn't the best naming for unmount flags,
but switching convention after we had a few doesn't make any sense.