From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Camille Moncelier <pix@devlife.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ext3] Changes to block device after an ext3 mount point has been remounted readonly
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:05:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100224170506.GN3687@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B855A97.4010702@redhat.com>
On Wed 24-02-10 10:57:59, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> >>> The fact is that I've been able to reproduce the problem on LVM block
> >>> devices, and sd* block devices so it's definitely not a loop device
> >>> specific problem.
> >>>
> >>> By the way, I tried several other things other than "echo s
> >>>> /proc/sysrq_trigger" I tried multiple sync followed with a one minute
> >>> "sleep",
> >>>
> >>> "echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" seems to lower the chances of "hash
> >>> changes" but doesn't stops them.
> >> Strange. When I use sync(1) in your script and use /dev/sda5 instead of a
> >> /dev/loop0, I cannot reproduce the problem (was running the script for
> >> something like an hour).
> > Theoretically some pages may exist after rw=>ro remount
> > because of generic race between write/sync, And they will be written
> > in by writepage if page already has buffers. This not happen in ext4
> > because. Each time it try to perform writepages it try to start_journal
> > and this result in EROFS.
> > The race bug will be closed some day but new one may appear again.
> >
> > Let's be honest and change ext3 writepage like follows:
> > - check ROFS flag inside write page
> > - dump writepage's errors.
> >
> >
>
> sounds like the wrong approach to me, we really need to fix the root
> cause and make remount,ro finish the job, I think.
>
> Throwing away writes which an application already thinks are completed
> just because remount,ro didn't keep up sounds like a bad idea. I think
> I would much rather have the write complete shortly after the readonly
> transition, if I had to choose...
Well, my opinion is that VFS should take care about the rw->ro transition
so that it isn't racy...
> I haven't looked at these paths at all but just hand-wavily,
> remount,ro should follow pretty much the same path as freeze,
> I think. And if freeze isn't getting everything on-disk we have
> an even bigger problem.
With freeze you can still keep dirty data in cache until the filesystem
unfreezes so it's a different situation from rw->ro transition.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 16:45 [ext3] Changes to block device after an ext3 mount point has been remounted readonly PiX
2010-02-18 16:50 ` Camille Moncelier
2010-02-18 21:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-02-19 7:38 ` Camille Moncelier
2010-02-22 22:32 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-22 23:05 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-22 23:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-02-23 8:42 ` Camille Moncelier
2010-02-23 13:55 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-24 16:01 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-02-24 16:26 ` Camille Moncelier
2010-02-24 16:59 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-24 16:56 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-02 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-02 10:01 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-03-02 13:26 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-02 23:10 ` Joel Becker
2010-02-24 16:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-24 17:05 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-02-24 17:26 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-02-24 21:36 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-02 10:29 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100224170506.GN3687@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pix@devlife.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).