From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] dquot: move dquot initialization responsibiliy into the filesystem Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:02:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20100303130255.GA32436@infradead.org> References: <20100220115101.469826792@bombadil.infradead.org> <20100220115213.803253745@bombadil.infradead.org> <20100302184437.GG3829@quack.suse.cz> <20100302195040.GA754@infradead.org> <20100303081602.GC6290@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:53056 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753815Ab0CCNC4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:02:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100303081602.GC6290@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 09:16:03AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 02-03-10 14:50:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:44:38PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > I've looked at the patch. I have several comments: > > > It seems that conversion of UDF is completely missing from the patch. > > > > Indeed. UDF also got left out at least from the dquot transfer patch > > which should have added one to it. Do you want me to respin those > > patches to include udf? > Yes, please respin dquot_transfer patches and dquot_drop seems to also > have the problem so those ones as well. I'll just respin the whole series, with your changes to the first two patches included.