From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: vfat vs msdos and -o flush
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:57:06 +0100
Message-ID: <20100309125706.GA18345@lst.de>
References: <20100301170827.GA5142@lst.de> <877hpt1q96.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20100307130642.GA32710@lst.de> <87sk8cgqup.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:56480 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751542Ab0CIM5P (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:57:15 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87sk8cgqup.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:15:42PM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> [BTW, I was thinking in past, just kill msdos and adds new shortname
> only option to vfat. ;)]

Sounds even better to me.  But I'm not uptodate on vfat internals enough
to decide whether that's easily doable.  We still can do that after
the consolidation I suggested above.