linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>, Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	a.gruenbacher@computer.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Correct behavior for listxattr and 'trusted' xattrs
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:40:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100310114035.GA32219@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1003021845310.1594@tundra.namei.org>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:01:05PM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> I audited the kernel for users of the trusted xattr namespace, and found 
> the following filesystems not checking for CAP_SYS_ADMIN:
> 
>   - jffs2
>   - ocfs2
>   - btrfs
>   - xfs

Now that everyone felt the consensus is that we need the check I look
into adding it into XFS, but it seems like we already have that check
in xfs_xattr_put_listent:

	/*
         * Only show root namespace entries if we are actually allowed to
	 * see them.
	 */
	if ((flags & XFS_ATTR_ROOT) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
		return 0;

Can you send me the testcases where XFs shows trusted attributes?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-10 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-02  8:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Correct behavior for listxattr and 'trusted' xattrs James Morris
2010-03-02  8:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] jffs2: ensure trusted xattrs are not returned to unprivileged users via listxattr James Morris
2010-03-02  8:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: " James Morris
2010-03-02  9:29   ` Joel Becker
2010-03-02 22:01     ` James Morris
2010-03-02 23:15     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-03-02  8:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Correct behavior for listxattr and 'trusted' xattrs Andreas Dilger
2010-03-03 13:02 ` Stephen Smalley
2010-03-10 11:48   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-03 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-10 11:26   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-10 11:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-03-10 14:04   ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100310114035.GA32219@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=a.gruenbacher@computer.org \
    --cc=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).