From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 1/2] kernel: introduce brlock
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:22:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100316122213.GP2869@laptop> (raw)
This second patchset scales the vfsmount lock. When it was last posted,
you were worried about commenting of lock requirements, and impact on
the slowpath. I have added comments and also done some slowpath measurements.
--
brlock: introduce special brlocks
This patch introduces special brlocks, these can only be used as global
locks, and use some preprocessor trickery to allow us to retain a more
optimal per-cpu lock implementation. We don't bother working around
lockdep yet.
The other thing we can do in future is a really neat atomic-free
implementation like Dave M did for the old brlocks, so we might actually
be able to speed up the single-thread path for these things.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
include/linux/brlock.h | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 112 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/brlock.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/brlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+/*
+ * Specialised big-reader spinlock. Can only be declared as global variables
+ * to avoid overhead and keep things simple (and we don't want to start using
+ * these inside dynamically allocated structures).
+ *
+ * Copyright 2009, Nick Piggin, Novell Inc.
+ */
+#ifndef __LINUX_BRLOCK_H
+#define __LINUX_BRLOCK_H
+
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <asm/atomic.h>
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
+#define DECLARE_BRLOCK(name) \
+ DECLARE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, name##_lock); \
+ extern void name##_lock_init(void); \
+ static inline void name##_rlock(void) { \
+ spinlock_t *lock; \
+ lock = &get_cpu_var(name##_lock); \
+ spin_lock(lock); \
+ put_cpu_var(name##_lock); \
+ } \
+ static inline void name##_runlock(void) { \
+ spinlock_t *lock; \
+ lock = &__get_cpu_var(name##_lock); \
+ spin_unlock(lock); \
+ } \
+ extern void name##_wlock(void); \
+ extern void name##_wunlock(void); \
+ static inline int name##_atomic_dec_and_rlock(atomic_t *a) { \
+ int ret; \
+ spinlock_t *lock; \
+ lock = &get_cpu_var(name##_lock); \
+ ret = atomic_dec_and_lock(a, lock); \
+ put_cpu_var(name##_lock); \
+ return ret; \
+ } \
+ extern int name##_atomic_dec_and_wlock__failed(atomic_t *a); \
+ static inline int name##_atomic_dec_and_wlock(atomic_t *a) { \
+ if (atomic_add_unless(a, -1, 1)) \
+ return 0; \
+ return name##_atomic_dec_and_wlock__failed(a); \
+ }
+
+#define DEFINE_BRLOCK(name) \
+ DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, name##_lock); \
+ void name##_lock_init(void) { \
+ int i; \
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i) { \
+ spinlock_t *lock; \
+ lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i); \
+ spin_lock_init(lock); \
+ } \
+ } \
+ void name##_wlock(void) { \
+ int i; \
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) { \
+ spinlock_t *lock; \
+ lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i); \
+ spin_lock(lock); \
+ } \
+ } \
+ void name##_wunlock(void) { \
+ int i; \
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) { \
+ spinlock_t *lock; \
+ lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i); \
+ spin_unlock(lock); \
+ } \
+ } \
+ int name##_atomic_dec_and_wlock__failed(atomic_t *a) { \
+ name##_wlock(); \
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(a)) { \
+ name##_wunlock(); \
+ return 0; \
+ } \
+ return 1; \
+ }
+
+#else
+
+#define DECLARE_BRLOCK(name) \
+ extern spinlock_t name##_lock; \
+ static inline void name##_lock_init(void) { \
+ spin_lock_init(&name##_lock); \
+ } \
+ static inline void name##_rlock(void) { \
+ spin_lock(&name##_lock); \
+ } \
+ static inline void name##_runlock(void) { \
+ spin_unlock(&name##_lock); \
+ } \
+ static inline void name##_wlock(void) { \
+ spin_lock(&name##_lock); \
+ } \
+ static inline void name##_wunlock(void) { \
+ spin_unlock(&name##_lock); \
+ } \
+ static inline int name##_atomic_dec_and_rlock(atomic_t *a) { \
+ return atomic_dec_and_lock(a, &name##_lock); \
+ } \
+ static inline int name##_atomic_dec_and_wlock(atomic_t *a) { \
+ return atomic_dec_and_lock(a, &name##_lock); \
+ }
+
+#define DEFINE_BRLOCK(name) \
+ spinlock_t name##_lock
+#endif
+
+#endif
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-16 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 12:22 Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-03-16 12:23 ` [patch 2/2] fs: scale vfsmount_lock Nick Piggin
2010-03-16 12:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 14:20 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 20:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-03-16 19:01 ` [patch 1/2] kernel: introduce brlock Andreas Dilger
2010-03-16 20:12 ` Frank Mayhar
2010-03-16 23:44 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 14:18 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100316122213.GP2869@laptop \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fmayhar@google.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).