linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] fs: cleanup files_lock
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:16:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100317141602.GA26661@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100316094423.GM2869@laptop>

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:44:23PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I would like to start sending bits of vfs scalability improvements to
> be reviewed and hopefully merged.
> 
> I will start with files_lock. Last time this one came up, it was
> criticised because some hoped to get rid of files list, and because
> it didn't have enough justification of the scalability improvement.
> 
> For the first criticism, it isn't any more difficult to rip out if
> we are ever able to remove files list. For the second, I have gathered
> some statistics and written better justification. Andi I believe is
> finding kbuild is becoming limited by files lock on larger systems.
> 
> --
> 
> fs: cleanup files_lock
> 
> Lock tty_files with a new spinlock, tty_files_lock; provide helpers to
> manipulate the per-sb files list; unexport the files_lock spinlock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

Looks good to me.  Do you want me to apply this to my tty tree, or do
you want to take it through your tree because your other patch depends
on this?

If you want to do it, feel free to add:
	Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
to the patch.

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-17 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-16  9:44 [patch 1/2] fs: cleanup files_lock Nick Piggin
2010-03-16  9:46 ` [patch 2/2] fs: scale files_lock Nick Piggin
2010-03-16 14:41 ` [patch 1/2] fs: cleanup files_lock Andi Kleen
2010-03-17 14:16 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-03-17 14:38   ` Nick Piggin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-04  6:51 [patch 00/33] my current vfs scalability patch queue npiggin
2009-09-04  6:51 ` [patch 03/33] fs: scale files_lock npiggin
2009-09-28 13:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-01  2:16     ` Nick Piggin
     [not found]       ` <r2i3282373b1004011751j440635b3n484018db2e2bc50c@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-02  2:24         ` [patch 1/2] fs: cleanup files_lock tim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100317141602.GA26661@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).