linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] kernel: introduce brlock
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:18:30 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100317141830.GJ2869@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100316234440.GU2869@laptop>

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:44:40AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:01:09PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On 2010-03-16, at 06:22, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > What makes these macros unpleasant is that it is no longer possible
> > to tag to the implementation to see what it does, since there is no
> > real declaration for these locks.
> > 
> > Is it possible to change the macros to take the lock name as a
> > parameter, like normal lock/unlock functions do, and then have a
> > single declaration for br_lock_init(), br_wlock(), etc. macros?
> 
> The problem is that then you can't do out of line functions, and
> things like wlock/wunlock are rather large.
> 
> What I think I can do is add macros in the brlock.h file
> 
> #define br_rlock(name) ##name_rlock()
> 
> So the macro calls the right function and your tag should take
> you pretty close to the right place.
> 
> Any better ideas how to implement this nicely would be welcome.
> It must be as light-weight as possible in the rlock path though.

It looks like this. Is it better?
--
brlock: introduce special brlocks

This patch introduces special brlocks, these can only be used as global
locks, and use some preprocessor trickery to allow us to retain a more
optimal per-cpu lock implementation. We don't bother working around
lockdep yet.

The other thing we can do in future is a really neat atomic-free
implementation like Dave M did for the old brlocks, so we might actually
be able to speed up the single-thread path for these things.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
 include/linux/brlock.h |  120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/brlock.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/brlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Specialised big-reader spinlock. Can only be declared as global variables
+ * to avoid overhead and keep things simple (and we don't want to start using
+ * these inside dynamically allocated structures).
+ *
+ * Copyright 2009, Nick Piggin, Novell Inc.
+ */
+#ifndef __LINUX_BRLOCK_H
+#define __LINUX_BRLOCK_H
+
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <asm/atomic.h>
+
+#define br_lock_init(name)	name##_lock_init()
+#define br_read_lock(name)	name##_read_lock()
+#define br_read_unlock(name)	name##_read_unlock()
+#define br_write_lock(name)	name##_write_lock()
+#define br_write_unlock(name)	name##_write_unlock()
+#define atomic_dec_and_br_read_lock(atomic, name)	name##_atomic_dec_and_read_lock(atomic)
+#define atomic_dec_and_br_write_lock(atomic, name)	name##_atomic_dec_and_write_lock(atomic)
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
+#define DECLARE_BRLOCK(name)						\
+ DECLARE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, name##_lock);				\
+ extern void name##_lock_init(void);					\
+ static inline void name##_read_lock(void) {				\
+	spinlock_t *lock;						\
+	lock = &get_cpu_var(name##_lock);				\
+	spin_lock(lock);						\
+	put_cpu_var(name##_lock);					\
+ }									\
+ static inline void name##_read_unlock(void) {				\
+	spinlock_t *lock;						\
+	lock = &__get_cpu_var(name##_lock);				\
+	spin_unlock(lock);						\
+ }									\
+ extern void name##_write_lock(void);					\
+ extern void name##_write_unlock(void);					\
+ static inline int name##_atomic_dec_and_read_lock(atomic_t *a) {	\
+	int ret;							\
+	spinlock_t *lock;						\
+	lock = &get_cpu_var(name##_lock);				\
+	ret = atomic_dec_and_lock(a, lock);				\
+	put_cpu_var(name##_lock);					\
+	return ret;							\
+ }									\
+ extern int name##_atomic_dec_and_write_lock__failed(atomic_t *a);	\
+ static inline int name##_atomic_dec_and_write_lock(atomic_t *a) {	\
+	if (atomic_add_unless(a, -1, 1))				\
+		return 0;						\
+	return name##_atomic_dec_and_write_lock__failed(a);		\
+ }
+
+#define DEFINE_BRLOCK(name)						\
+ DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, name##_lock);				\
+ void name##_lock_init(void) {						\
+	int i;								\
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {					\
+		spinlock_t *lock;					\
+		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
+		spin_lock_init(lock);					\
+	}								\
+ }									\
+ void name##_write_lock(void) {						\
+	int i;								\
+	for_each_online_cpu(i) {					\
+		spinlock_t *lock;					\
+		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
+		spin_lock(lock);					\
+	}								\
+ }									\
+ void name##_write_unlock(void) {						\
+	int i;								\
+	for_each_online_cpu(i) {					\
+		spinlock_t *lock;					\
+		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
+		spin_unlock(lock);					\
+	}								\
+ }									\
+ int name##_atomic_dec_and_write_lock__failed(atomic_t *a) {		\
+	name##_write_lock();						\
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(a)) {					\
+		name##_write_unlock();					\
+		return 0;						\
+	}								\
+	return 1;							\
+ }
+
+#else
+
+#define DECLARE_BRLOCK(name)						\
+ extern spinlock_t name##_lock;						\
+ static inline void name##_lock_init(void) {				\
+	spin_lock_init(&name##_lock);					\
+ }									\
+ static inline void name##_read_lock(void) {				\
+	spin_lock(&name##_lock);					\
+ }									\
+ static inline void name##_read_unlock(void) {				\
+	spin_unlock(&name##_lock);					\
+ }									\
+ static inline void name##_write_lock(void) {				\
+	spin_lock(&name##_lock);					\
+ }									\
+ static inline void name##_write_unlock(void) {				\
+	spin_unlock(&name##_lock);					\
+ }									\
+ static inline int name##_atomic_dec_and_read_lock(atomic_t *a) {	\
+	return atomic_dec_and_lock(a, &name##_lock);			\
+ }									\
+ static inline int name##_atomic_dec_and_write_lock(atomic_t *a) {	\
+	return atomic_dec_and_lock(a, &name##_lock);			\
+ }
+
+#define DEFINE_BRLOCK(name)						\
+ spinlock_t name##_lock
+#endif
+
+#endif

      reply	other threads:[~2010-03-17 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-16 12:22 [patch 1/2] kernel: introduce brlock Nick Piggin
2010-03-16 12:23 ` [patch 2/2] fs: scale vfsmount_lock Nick Piggin
2010-03-16 12:28   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 14:20   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 20:33     ` Andreas Dilger
2010-03-16 19:01 ` [patch 1/2] kernel: introduce brlock Andreas Dilger
2010-03-16 20:12   ` Frank Mayhar
2010-03-16 23:44   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 14:18     ` Nick Piggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100317141830.GJ2869@laptop \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).