From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chris.mason@oracle.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce freeze_super and thaw_super for the fsfreeze ioctl
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:17:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100324011714.GA5658@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA93FE3.9020502@crca.org.au>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:25:39AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> A cc would have been nice :)
>
> Thankfully the subject caught my eye.
>
Well it's not really tux-on-ice's fault, freeze wouldn't work _at all_ via the
ioctl or any other method, we just happened to notice it was broken because
people using tux-on-ice were getting corrupt filesystems after suspend :). Btw,
it may be good to have freezer_sync set to 1 by default, otherwise if an fs
doesnt support freezing it will likely end up corrupted too. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-24 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-23 14:22 [PATCH] Introduce freeze_super and thaw_super for the fsfreeze ioctl Josef Bacik
2010-03-23 14:28 ` Al Viro
2010-03-23 14:34 ` Josef Bacik
2010-03-23 14:48 ` Al Viro
2010-03-23 15:03 ` Josef Bacik
2010-03-23 15:09 ` Al Viro
2010-03-23 15:12 ` Al Viro
2010-03-23 15:15 ` Al Viro
2010-03-23 22:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-23 23:18 ` Al Viro
2010-03-23 23:47 ` Al Viro
2010-03-23 23:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-23 23:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-24 0:21 ` Al Viro
2010-03-24 0:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-24 0:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-23 18:19 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-03-23 22:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-24 1:17 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2010-03-24 5:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100324011714.GA5658@localhost.localdomain \
--to=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).