From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce freeze_super and thaw_super for the fsfreeze
	ioctl
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:17:15 -0400
Message-ID: <20100324011714.GA5658@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20100323142200.GA2381@localhost.localdomain> <4BA93FE3.9020502@crca.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BA93FE3.9020502@crca.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:25:39AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> A cc would have been nice :)
>
> Thankfully the subject caught my eye.
>

Well it's not really tux-on-ice's fault, freeze wouldn't work _at all_ via the
ioctl or any other method, we just happened to notice it was broken because
people using tux-on-ice were getting corrupt filesystems after suspend :).  Btw,
it may be good to have freezer_sync set to 1 by default, otherwise if an fs
doesnt support freezing it will likely end up corrupted too.  Thanks,

Josef