linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Reduce stack usage used by page reclaim V1
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100416145023.GI19264@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271352103-2280-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This is just an RFC to reduce some of the more obvious stack usage in page
> reclaim. It's a bit rushed and I haven't tested this yet but am sending
> it out as there may be others working on similar material and would rather
> avoid overlap. I built on some of Kosaki Motohiro's work.
> 

So the first pass seems to have been reasonably well received. Kosaki,
Rik and Johannes, how you do typically test reclaim-related patches for
regressions? My initial sniff-tests look ok with the page leak sorted out
but I typically am not searching for vmscan regressions other than lumpy
reclaim.

> On X86 bit, stack usage figures (generated using a modified bloat-o-meter

This should have been X86-64. The stack shrinkage is less on X86
obviously because of the difference size of pointers and the like.

> that uses checkstack.pl as its input) change in the following ways after
> the series of patches.
> 
> add/remove: 2/0 grow/shrink: 0/4 up/down: 804/-1688 (-884)
> function                                     old     new   delta
> putback_lru_pages                              -     676    +676
> update_isolated_counts                         -     128    +128
> do_try_to_free_pages                         172     128     -44
> kswapd                                      1324    1168    -156
> shrink_page_list                            1616    1224    -392
> shrink_zone                                 2320    1224   -1096
> 
> There are some growths there but critically they are no longer in the path
> that would call writepages. In the main path, there is about 1K of stack
> lopped off giving a small amount of breathing room.
> 
> KOSAKI Motohiro (3):
>   vmscan: kill prev_priority completely
>   vmscan: move priority variable into scan_control
>   vmscan: simplify shrink_inactive_list()
> 
> Mel Gorman (7):
>   vmscan: Remove useless loop at end of do_try_to_free_pages
>   vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary vars in do_try_to_free_pages
>   vmscan: Split shrink_zone to reduce stack usage
>   vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary variables in shrink_zone()
>   vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_inactive_list()
>   vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_page_list()
>   vmscan: Update isolated page counters outside of main path in
>     shrink_inactive_list()
> 
>  include/linux/mmzone.h |   15 --
>  mm/page_alloc.c        |    2 -
>  mm/vmscan.c            |  447 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  mm/vmstat.c            |    2 -
>  4 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 256 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-16 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-15 17:21 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Reduce stack usage used by page reclaim V1 Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] vmscan: kill prev_priority completely Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 22:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] vmscan: move priority variable into scan_control Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 22:48   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-05-26 10:23     ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-28  2:39       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] vmscan: simplify shrink_inactive_list() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 22:54   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] vmscan: Remove useless loop at end of do_try_to_free_pages Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  2:48   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 22:56   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary vars in do_try_to_free_pages Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  2:47   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] vmscan: Split shrink_zone to reduce stack usage Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  4:23   ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-16 14:27     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  6:26   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 23:14   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary variables in shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  2:51   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 23:03     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-05-26 11:21       ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-28  2:51         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_inactive_list() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  4:27   ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-16  6:30   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 14:31     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 23:28   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_page_list() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  7:54   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 14:34     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 17:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] vmscan: Update isolated page counters outside of main path in shrink_inactive_list() Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 11:19   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 14:35     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-16 23:34   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-16 14:50 ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100416145023.GI19264@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).