linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Direct aio_write/truncate question
@ 2010-04-24 11:29 Dmitry Monakhov
  2010-04-26 23:55 ` Dave Chinner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Monakhov @ 2010-04-24 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: Andrew Morton, jens.axboe

My be my question appeared to obvious for someone, but still

fd = open("a", O_DIRECT, )
fd2 = open("b", O_DIRECT, )
write(fd, buf ,size) /* allocate blocks for a file */
fsync(fd) /* Now, it is guaranteed that blocks are allocated.*/
/* Submit async rewrite request */ 
io_prep_pwrite(io, fd, io->u.c.buf, size, 0);
io_submit(myctx, 1, io); /* Io is in flight after this */
/* Ok, truncate the file */
ftruncate(fd, 0)
/* Reuse truncated block blocks for a new file */
write(fd2,buf ,size)     /* old a's blocks belongs to b now. */

What protect us from aio request to rewrite content of new file?
Or even corrupt fs because old blocks may be used as metadata now.
Seems unmap_underlying_metadata() can not help us here because async
io context does not dirty or locked any bh because they was already
allocated. Fairly to say. I can not reproduce rewrite effect.
I use ext4 with external journal, so where a io_barriers in fs_dev's
blktrace log.
Seems what rewrite effect no happens only because blklayer does not
reorganized issued requests. But nothing is preventing this right?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-26 23:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-24 11:29 Direct aio_write/truncate question Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-26 23:55 ` Dave Chinner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).