linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	hch@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] new ->perform_write fop
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:35:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100517233540.GM3364@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100514064145.GJ13617@dastard>

On Fri 14-05-10 16:41:45, Dave Chinner wrote:
...
> Well, the "RESERVE" callout I proposed should mean that the
> allocation that follows the copy should never fail with ENOSPC. i.e.
> if there isn't space, the RESERVE call will fail with ENOSPC, not
> the actual ALLOCATE call that occurs after the data is copied.
> 
> Basically I was thinking that in the XFS case, RESERVE would scan the
> range for holes, and reserve all blocks needed to fill all the holes
> in the range. Then the ALLOCATE call would mark them all delalloc.
> The space reservation and delalloc is done in a single call right
> now, but splitting them is not hard...
  But this would mean that you would have to implement at least a basic
delayed allocation support for filesystems like ext2, ext3, udf, vfat, etc.
They currently do not have a way to provide a functionality you require
from RESERVE call...
  Not that it would be so hard to do - I actually have some patches for
ext2/3 doing that because of problems with ENOSPC during mmaped writes but
it's not completely trivial either.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-17 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-12 21:24 [RFC] new ->perform_write fop Josef Bacik
2010-05-13  1:39 ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-13 15:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-14  1:00   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-14  3:30     ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-14  5:50       ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-14  7:20         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-14  7:33           ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-14  6:41       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-14  7:22         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-14  8:38           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-14 13:33             ` Chris Mason
2010-05-18  6:36             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-18  8:05               ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-18 10:43                 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-18 12:27                   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-18 15:09                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-19 23:50                       ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-20  6:48                         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-20 20:12                         ` Jan Kara
2010-05-20 23:05                           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-21  9:05                             ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-05-21 13:50                             ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 14:23                               ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-21 15:19                                 ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-24  3:29                                   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-22  0:31                               ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-21 18:58                             ` Jan Kara
2010-05-22  0:27                               ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-24  9:20                                 ` Jan Kara
2010-05-24  9:33                                   ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-05 15:05                                   ` tytso
2010-06-06  7:59                                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-21 15:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-22  2:31             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-22  8:37               ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-24  3:09                 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-24  5:53                   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-24  6:55                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-24 10:21                       ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-01  6:27                         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-24 18:40                       ` Joel Becker
2010-05-17 23:35         ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-05-18  1:21           ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100517233540.GM3364@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).