linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] inode: Make unused inode LRU per superblock
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:32:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527133230.780be6c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274777588-21494-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Tue, 25 May 2010 18:53:04 +1000
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:

> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> The inode unused list is currently a global LRU. This does not match
> the other global filesystem cache - the dentry cache - which uses
> per-superblock LRU lists. Hence we have related filesystem object
> types using different LRU reclaimatin schemes.
> 
> To enable a per-superblock filesystem cache shrinker, both of these
> caches need to have per-sb unused object LRU lists. Hence this patch
> converts the global inode LRU to per-sb LRUs.
> 
> The patch only does rudimentary per-sb propotioning in the shrinker
> infrastructure, as this gets removed when the per-sb shrinker
> callouts are introduced later on.
> 
> ...
>
> +			list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_inode_lru);

It's a shape that s_inode_lru is still protected by inode_lock.  One
day we're going to get in trouble over that lock.  Migrating to a
per-sb lock would be logical and might help.

Did you look into this?  I expect we'd end up taking both inode_lock
and the new sb->lru_lock in several places, which wouldn't be of any
help, at least in the interim.  Long-term, the locking for
fs-writeback.c should move to the per-superblock one also, at which
time this problem largely goes away I think.  Unfortunately the
writeback inode lists got moved into the backing_dev_info, whcih messes
things up a bit.

>  	inodes_stat.nr_unused--;
> +	inode->i_sb->s_nr_inodes_unused--;

It's regrettable to be counting the same thing twice.  Did you look
into removing (or no longer using) inodes_stat.nr_unused?


> +		/* Now, we reclaim unused dentrins with fairness.

May as well fix the typo while we're there.

Please review all these comments to ensure that they are still accurate
and complete.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-27 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-25  8:53 [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2 Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] inode: Make unused inode LRU per superblock Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:17   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 23:01     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  2:04       ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:02         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:23           ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-05-27 22:54     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28 10:07       ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: add context argument to shrinker callback Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:41   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 23:12     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  1:53       ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] " Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:01         ` Al Viro
2010-05-27  6:17           ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  6:46             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  2:19       ` [PATCH 3/5] " Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  4:07         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27  4:24           ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27  6:35   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 22:40     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28  5:19       ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31  6:39         ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-31  7:28           ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 23:01     ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] superblock: add filesystem shrinker operations Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 20:32   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-25  8:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: make use of new shrinker callout Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2 Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-28  0:30   ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28  7:42   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-02 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-12  2:41   ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12  2:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-14  7:24 [PATCH 0/5] Per-superblock shrinkers Dave Chinner
2010-05-14  7:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] inode: Make unused inode LRU per superblock Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100527133230.780be6c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).