From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] superblock: add filesystem shrinker operations
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:32:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527133239.5d038d9c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274777588-21494-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On Tue, 25 May 2010 18:53:07 +1000
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Now we have a per-superblock shrinker implementation, we can add a
> filesystem specific callout to it to allow filesystem internal
> caches to be shrunk by the superblock shrinker.
>
> Rather than perpetuate the multipurpose shrinker callback API (i.e.
> nr_to_scan == 0 meaning "tell me how many objects freeable in the
> cache), two operations will be added. The first will return the
> number of objects that are freeable, the second is the actual
> shrinker call.
>
>
> ...
>
> static int prune_super(struct shrinker *shrink, int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> struct super_block *sb;
> - int count;
> + int fs_objects = 0;
> + int total_objects;
>
> sb = container_of(shrink, struct super_block, s_shrink);
>
> @@ -63,22 +64,40 @@ static int prune_super(struct shrinker *shrink, int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> return -1;
> }
>
> - if (nr_to_scan) {
> - /* proportion the scan between the two cache__ */
> - int total;
> -
> - total = sb->s_nr_dentry_unused + sb->s_nr_inodes_unused + 1;
> - count = (nr_to_scan * sb->s_nr_dentry_unused) / total;
> + if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
> + fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb);
>
> - /* prune dcache first as icache is pinned by it */
> - prune_dcache_sb(sb, count);
> - prune_icache_sb(sb, nr_to_scan - count);
> + total_objects = sb->s_nr_dentry_unused +
> + sb->s_nr_inodes_unused + fs_objects + 1;
> + if (nr_to_scan) {
> + int dentries;
> + int inodes;
> +
> + /* proportion the scan between the cache__ */
> + dentries = (nr_to_scan * sb->s_nr_dentry_unused) /
> + total_objects;
> + inodes = (nr_to_scan * sb->s_nr_inodes_unused) /
> + total_objects;
> + if (fs_objects)
> + fs_objects = (nr_to_scan * fs_objects) /
> + total_objects;
> + /*
> + * prune the dcache first as the icache is pinned by it, then
> + * prune the icache, followed by the filesystem specific caches
> + */
> + prune_dcache_sb(sb, dentries);
> + prune_icache_sb(sb, inodes);
> + if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->free_cached_objects) {
Under which circumstances is a NULL ->free_cached_objects valid?
> + sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, fs_objects);
> + fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb);
> + }
> + total_objects = sb->s_nr_dentry_unused +
> + sb->s_nr_inodes_unused + fs_objects;
> }
The return value from ->free_cached_objects() doesn't actually get
used. Instead the code calls ->nr_cached_objects() twice.
> - count = ((sb->s_nr_dentry_unused + sb->s_nr_inodes_unused) / 100)
> - * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
> + total_objects = (total_objects / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
> up_read(&sb->s_umount);
> - return count;
> + return total_objects;
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 5bff2dc..efcdcc6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1590,6 +1590,17 @@ struct super_operations {
> ssize_t (*quota_write)(struct super_block *, int, const char *, size_t, loff_t);
> #endif
> int (*bdev_try_to_free_page)(struct super_block*, struct page*, gfp_t);
> +
> + /*
> + * memory shrinker operations.
> + * ->nr_cached_objects() should return the number of freeable cached
> + * objects the filesystem holds.
> + * ->free_cache_objects() should attempt to free the number of cached
> + * objects indicated. It should return how many objects it attempted to
> + * free.
> + */
I'd have thought that ->free_cache_objects() would always return the
number which it was passed. Unless someone asked it to scan more
objects than exist, perhaps.
> + int (*nr_cached_objects)(struct super_block *);
> + int (*free_cached_objects)(struct super_block *, int);
> };
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-25 8:53 [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2 Dave Chinner
2010-05-25 8:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] inode: Make unused inode LRU per superblock Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:17 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 23:01 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 2:04 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 4:02 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 4:23 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 22:54 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28 10:07 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-25 8:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: add context argument to shrinker callback Dave Chinner
2010-05-25 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:41 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-26 23:12 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 1:53 ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] " Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 4:01 ` Al Viro
2010-05-27 6:17 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 6:46 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 2:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] " Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 4:07 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 4:24 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 6:35 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 22:40 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28 5:19 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31 6:39 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-31 7:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 23:01 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-25 8:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] superblock: add filesystem shrinker operations Dave Chinner
2010-05-27 20:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-05-25 8:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: make use of new shrinker callout Dave Chinner
2010-05-26 16:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2 Nick Piggin
2010-05-27 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-28 0:30 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-28 7:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-02 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-12 2:41 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12 2:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-14 7:24 [PATCH 0/5] Per-superblock shrinkers Dave Chinner
2010-05-14 7:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] superblock: add filesystem shrinker operations Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100527133239.5d038d9c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).