* [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates
@ 2010-05-27 15:15 Chris Mason
2010-05-27 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2010-05-27 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
Hi everyone,
The master branch of the btrfs-unstable tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git master
Has the first round of btrfs updates for 2.6.35-rc. I still have some
pending fixes and patches queued up from other people, but this pull
request has the two major features for this release.
First we've got a large ENOSPC improvement from Yan Zheng. He hit on
all the difficult corners including space balancing, drive management,
fsync logging and many others. This has been in the works for sometime
and it has held up very well in testing.
The second batch is O_DIRECT work from Josef Bacik. We've had a few
different iterations on ENOSPC floating on the btrfs list, and this one
takes a much less complex road by hooking into the generic
fs/direct-io.c code. Josef added a hook for bio submission to
fs/direct-io.c so that we could do proper block number transaction and
properly do multi-device IO.
There are small changes in here to fs/direct-io.c, mm/filemap.c and
include/linux/fs.h. These have been sent out for review a few times and
commented on. The filemap.c change allows O_DIRECT reads to fall back
to buffered IO, which we need to support compression and do checksumming
IOs < 1 page.
My commits here are just integrating the two and fixing a few bugs in
the result.
Zheng Yan (13) commits (+4076/-2679):
Btrfs: Integrate metadata reservation with start_transaction (+678/-528)
Btrfs: Update metadata reservation for delayed allocation (+232/-415)
Btrfs: Shrink delay allocated space in a synchronized (+88/-121)
Btrfs: Introduce contexts for metadata reservation (+853/-385)
Btrfs: Link block groups of different raid types (+121/-55)
Btrfs: Metadata ENOSPC handling for balance (+1163/-747)
Btrfs: Metadata ENOSPC handling for tree log (+156/-128)
Btrfs: Metadata reservation for orphan inodes (+365/-66)
Btrfs: Pre-allocate space for data relocation (+92/-45)
Btrfs: Introduce global metadata reservation (+241/-76)
Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race (+1/-1)
Btrfs: Kill allocate_wait in space_info (+58/-76)
Btrfs: Kill init_btrfs_i() (+28/-36)
Chris Mason (9) commits (+314/-80):
Btrfs: fix preallocation and nodatacow checks in O_DIRECT (+140/-16)
Btrfs: move O_DIRECT space reservation to btrfs_direct_IO (+8/-6)
Btrfs: don't walk around with task->state != TASK_RUNNING (+4/-3)
Btrfs: use async helpers for DIO write checksumming (+52/-17)
Btrfs: add more error checking to btrfs_dirty_inode (+13/-2)
Btrfs: avoid ENOSPC errors in btrfs_dirty_inode (+11/-3)
Btrfs: rework O_DIRECT enospc handling (+49/-30)
Btrfs: drop verbose enospc printk (+2/-0)
Btrfs: allow unaligned DIO (+35/-3)
Josef Bacik (5) commits (+829/-134):
direct-io: add a hook for the fs to provide its own submit_bio function (+45/-8)
fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO (+31/-5)
direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous requests (+18/-2)
Btrfs: add basic DIO read/write support (+631/-36)
Btrfs: do aio_write instead of write (+104/-83)
Total: (27) commits
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2317 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1991 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1797 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
fs/btrfs/file.c | 304 +++---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 241 +++-
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 232 +++-
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 206 ++--
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 171 +--
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 163 ++-
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 109 +-
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c | 101 --
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 85 -
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 82 +
fs/direct-io.c | 62 +
mm/filemap.c | 36
fs/btrfs/super.c | 30
fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 28
fs/btrfs/inode-item.c | 27
fs/btrfs/transaction.h | 24
fs/btrfs/root-tree.c | 23
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 17
fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 14
fs/btrfs/xattr.c | 12
include/linux/fs.h | 11
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 9
fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 7
fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 4
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h | 3
fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 3
fs/btrfs/tree-log.h | 2
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 1
31 files changed, 5219 insertions(+), 2893 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates
2010-05-27 15:15 [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates Chris Mason
@ 2010-05-27 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27 17:32 ` Chris Mason
2010-06-02 2:59 ` Miao Xie
2010-09-12 12:38 ` Felipe Contreras
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-05-27 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason; +Cc: linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2317 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1991 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1797 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> fs/btrfs/file.c | 304 +++---
> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 241 +++-
> ...
What kind of bogus diffstat is this?
Don't do that. I cannot compare your bogus diffstat with what I get,
because it's just random noise. You've apparently sorted it by size of the
damage, but the numbers are total crap too. That is _not_ the actual size
of the changes at all.
I suspect you have some script that adds up all the patches, but that's
wrong. If a subsequent patch changes the things that an earlier patch has
done, then the numbers don't just add up.
And if the diffstat doesn't match what I get when I pull, then my reaction
inevitably is "ok, that's not what they asked me to pull, so I'll just
reject it out-of-hand". So don't play games with diffstats - that just
means that things won't get pulled.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates
2010-05-27 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2010-05-27 17:32 ` Chris Mason
2010-05-27 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2010-05-27 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:18:04AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
> >
> > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2317 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1991 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1797 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > fs/btrfs/file.c | 304 +++---
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 241 +++-
> > ...
>
> What kind of bogus diffstat is this?
>
> Don't do that. I cannot compare your bogus diffstat with what I get,
> because it's just random noise. You've apparently sorted it by size of the
> damage, but the numbers are total crap too. That is _not_ the actual size
> of the changes at all.
My the btrfs-unstable repo is against v2.6.34, here is a 'pure'
diffstat. My script ends up piping the git log -p output through
diffstat, which does give different numbers. I'll use the git diff
variant from now on.
# git diff v2.6.34 HEAD | diffstat
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 1
fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 3
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 109 +-
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 163 ++-
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c | 101 --
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h | 3
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 169 +--
fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 4
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2255 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 85 -
fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 14
fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 28
fs/btrfs/file.c | 166 ++-
fs/btrfs/inode-item.c | 27
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1713 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 206 ++--
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 82 +
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 9
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1971 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
fs/btrfs/root-tree.c | 23
fs/btrfs/super.c | 30
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 232 +++-
fs/btrfs/transaction.h | 24
fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 7
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 241 +++--
fs/btrfs/tree-log.h | 2
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 17
fs/btrfs/xattr.c | 12
fs/direct-io.c | 62 +
include/linux/fs.h | 11
mm/filemap.c | 36
31 files changed, 5066 insertions(+), 2740 deletions(-)
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates
2010-05-27 17:32 ` Chris Mason
@ 2010-05-27 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-05-27 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason; +Cc: linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> # git diff v2.6.34 HEAD | diffstat
That still has the potential to be wrong (but got the numbers I expected
this time). It will be wrong in several cases:
- "diffstat" has some random common prefix removal logic that I've never
figured out the exact rules for.
You don't happen to see it, because you actually had changes outside of
fs/btrfs (so there was no common prefix to worry about), but if
everything had been inside fs/btrfs, then at least some versions of
diffstat will just remove that whole thing as common, and talk about
changes to 'ioctl.c' rather than 'fs/btrfs/ioctl.c'
(And no, I'm not entirely sure what triggers it. It might only happen
for certain patterns and/or certain versions of diffstat, but it's a
reason to avoid diffstat in general, or at least use "-p1" to make it
reliable)
- it will do the wrong thing for renames and copies.
- it doesn't give the summary that pull-request does, which talks about
new, deleted and file-mode-changed files.
So just do
git diff --stat --summary -M v2.6.34..HEAD
instead, which gets all the above cases right. Also, you don't even need
to remember where you started - you might as well use git to do that too,
and write it as (assuming you have an 'origin' branch that points to the
upstream tree):
git diff --stat --summary -M origin...HEAD
(note the *three* dots: that says that you should diff against the common
ancestor, so git will just figure out where you started on its own).
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates
2010-05-27 15:15 [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates Chris Mason
2010-05-27 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2010-06-02 2:59 ` Miao Xie
2010-09-12 12:38 ` Felipe Contreras
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miao Xie @ 2010-06-02 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason, Linus Torvalds, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel,
linux-fsdevel
Hi, Chris
on 2010-5-27 23:15, Chris Mason wrote:
> My commits here are just integrating the two and fixing a few bugs in
> the result.
>
> Zheng Yan (13) commits (+4076/-2679):
> Btrfs: Integrate metadata reservation with start_transaction (+678/-528)
> Btrfs: Update metadata reservation for delayed allocation (+232/-415)
> Btrfs: Shrink delay allocated space in a synchronized (+88/-121)
> Btrfs: Introduce contexts for metadata reservation (+853/-385)
> Btrfs: Link block groups of different raid types (+121/-55)
> Btrfs: Metadata ENOSPC handling for balance (+1163/-747)
> Btrfs: Metadata ENOSPC handling for tree log (+156/-128)
> Btrfs: Metadata reservation for orphan inodes (+365/-66)
> Btrfs: Pre-allocate space for data relocation (+92/-45)
> Btrfs: Introduce global metadata reservation (+241/-76)
> Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race (+1/-1)
> Btrfs: Kill allocate_wait in space_info (+58/-76)
> Btrfs: Kill init_btrfs_i() (+28/-36)
>
> Chris Mason (9) commits (+314/-80):
> Btrfs: fix preallocation and nodatacow checks in O_DIRECT (+140/-16)
> Btrfs: move O_DIRECT space reservation to btrfs_direct_IO (+8/-6)
> Btrfs: don't walk around with task->state != TASK_RUNNING (+4/-3)
> Btrfs: use async helpers for DIO write checksumming (+52/-17)
> Btrfs: add more error checking to btrfs_dirty_inode (+13/-2)
> Btrfs: avoid ENOSPC errors in btrfs_dirty_inode (+11/-3)
> Btrfs: rework O_DIRECT enospc handling (+49/-30)
> Btrfs: drop verbose enospc printk (+2/-0)
> Btrfs: allow unaligned DIO (+35/-3)
>
> Josef Bacik (5) commits (+829/-134):
> direct-io: add a hook for the fs to provide its own submit_bio function (+45/-8)
> fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO (+31/-5)
> direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous requests (+18/-2)
> Btrfs: add basic DIO read/write support (+631/-36)
> Btrfs: do aio_write instead of write (+104/-83)
>
> Total: (27) commits
>
In the following mail, You said that you had put the cleanups which Zhao Lei and I contributed
into a .35 queue, but I cannot find those patches have been merged into the .35 kernel...
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=127049622906168&w=2
Is there anything wrong with those patches?
Regards
Miao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates
2010-05-27 15:15 [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates Chris Mason
2010-05-27 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 2:59 ` Miao Xie
@ 2010-09-12 12:38 ` Felipe Contreras
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Contreras @ 2010-09-12 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason, Linus Torvalds, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel,
linux-fsdevel
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:
> Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race (+1/-1)
This seems to cause a hang when there are "parent transid verify failed" errors.
Somebody on #btrfs told me to revert it, and at least the system
doesn't hang any more.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-12 12:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-27 15:15 [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates Chris Mason
2010-05-27 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27 17:32 ` Chris Mason
2010-05-27 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 2:59 ` Miao Xie
2010-09-12 12:38 ` Felipe Contreras
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).