From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nobh mount option in ext3/4?
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:10:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100601091041.GA28762@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100531175557.GC5334@quack.suse.cz>
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:55:58PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> IMHO nobh can go away from ext3/ext4.
I'll send patches.
> I would be also in favor of
> removing all the nobh logic from VFS and ext2 but for ext2 it saves some
> low memory so some people might actually use it.
I agree that we should get rid of it entirely, but that's the next step.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-01 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-31 12:40 nobh mount option in ext3/4? Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-31 17:55 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-01 9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100601091041.GA28762@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).