From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] check ATTR_SIZE contraints in inode_change_ok
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:47:03 +0200
Message-ID: <20100601114703.GA5169@lst.de>
References: <20100601113915.GA4861@lst.de> <20100601113937.GB4929@lst.de> <1275392975.2346.4.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	npiggin@suse.de, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Steven Whitehouse <steve@chygwyn.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:45422 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752791Ab0FALrU (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:47:20 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1275392975.2346.4.camel@localhost>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:49:35PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can you drop the GFS2 bit from this? I've got patches for the new
> truncate sequence for GFS2 and that bit you have altered in the patch
> below doesn't exist after that patch is applied,

I'd really prefer to get all these preparation in before converting
filesystems if possible.  They change a lot of the helpers to be used
in ->setattr, so getting the infrastructure right should make it
a lot more clear what's happening in the filesystem code.