From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
open-osd <osd-dev@open-osd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ver3] exofs: New truncate sequence
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:09:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100601150918.GY9453@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C04EF92.6060600@panasas.com>
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
> These changes are crafted based on the similar
> conversion done to ext2 by Nick Piggin.
>
> * Remove the deprecated ->truncate vector. Let exofs_setattr
> take care of on-disk size updates.
> * Call truncate_pagecache on the unused pages if
> write_begin/end fails.
> * Cleanup exofs_delete_inode that did stupid inode
> writes and updates on an inode that will be
> removed.
> * And finally get rid of exofs_get_block. We never
> had any blocks it was all for calling nobh_truncate_page.
> nobh_truncate_page is not actually needed in exofs since
> the last page is complete and gone, just like all the other
> pages. There is no partial blocks in exofs.
> [OK do I need a partial read here upto i_size ???]
You shouldn't need to. We do have some interesting code trying to deal
with mmap data past i_size in core/buffer code. I hope Jan's patches
can improve that.
But anyway if you are not doing byte based IO, you have to remember
that if you mark a page uptodate, it should not contain uninitialized
data past i_size. Also, in the writeback path, junk data can get
written past i_size too.
The latter case is difficult to avoid (due to concurrent mmap writes).
It is not technically a leak perhaps, but it's a bit nasty if you allow
data to be hidden past i_size. The best course of action IMO is to
zero this out at read-in and truncate-extend time.
Doesn't seem like you have to worry about any of that if you have
byte granularity , although you do have EXOFS_BLKSHIFT defined?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-01 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-31 12:30 [RFC] exofs: New truncate sequence Boaz Harrosh
2010-05-31 13:44 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31 14:13 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-05-31 14:33 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31 14:50 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-05-31 15:09 ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-31 15:19 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-01 10:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-01 10:26 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-01 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-01 11:05 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-01 11:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-01 10:28 ` [PATCH ver2] " Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-01 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-01 10:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-01 11:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-01 11:31 ` [PATCH ver3] " Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-01 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-01 11:52 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-01 15:09 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100601150918.GY9453@laptop \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).