From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: force block allocation on quota_off Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:36:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20100606223641.GA3302@quack.suse.cz> References: <20100531191130.GE5334@quack.suse.cz> <1275377988-4299-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20100601121107.GE4275@quack.suse.cz> <20100605145530.GA9159@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , Dmitry Monakhov , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: tytso@mit.edu Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:45359 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717Ab0FFWhB (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:37:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100605145530.GA9159@thunk.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat 05-06-10 10:55:30, tytso@mit.edu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:11:08PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Tue 01-06-10 11:39:47, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > > Perform full sync procedure to guarantee quota consistency. > > The patch looks OK to me. Acked-by: Jan Kara > > Ted, will you merge it or should I do it? > > I'll take it, but I don't think either of these is critical enough to > merge now that the merge window is closed. Agreed? Yes, I agree. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR