linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] tty: stop abusing file->f_u.fu_list
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:22:52 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100608052252.GO26335@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100604183934.GA2309@infradead.org>

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:39:34PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The ttry code currently abuses the file anchor for the per-sb file list
> to track instances of a given tty.  But there's no good reason for
> that, we can just install a proxy object in file->private that gets
> added to the list and points to the tty and keep the list away from
> VFS internals.

Well this code looks like the error handling is broken and it's pretty
convoluted to fix (eg. tty_release requires tty from filp but is called
to clean up code from before tty file private structure is allocated).

So I really prefer to put my original patch first. I really don't see
how it makes the tty code more of a special case. In both cases, it
must know that the vfs does not require the file's presence on the
s_files list so it can be reused for tty code. After my patch, it no
longer knows any details about how the vfs does locking for the list.

Possibly a lighter way to do what you want is to have the vfs not use
fu_list for device inodes and define drivers to be allowed to use it for
their own purpose. But that is easily possible after my patch.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-08  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-04  6:43 [patch 0/4] Initial vfs scalability patches again Nick Piggin
2010-06-04  6:43 ` [patch 1/4] fs: cleanup files_lock Nick Piggin
2010-06-04  8:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-04 14:20     ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-04 14:39       ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-04 15:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-04 18:39   ` [PATCH, RFC] tty: stop abusing file->f_u.fu_list Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-04 19:35     ` Al Viro
2010-06-05 11:39     ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-08  5:22     ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-06-04  6:43 ` [patch 2/4] lglock: introduce special lglock and brlock spin locks Nick Piggin
2010-06-04  7:56   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-04 14:13     ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-04 14:24       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-04 15:03   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-04 15:12     ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-04  6:43 ` [patch 3/4] fs: scale files_lock Nick Piggin
2010-06-04  6:43 ` [patch 4/4] fs: brlock vfsmount_lock Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100608052252.GO26335@laptop \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).