From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] writeback: fix writeback_inodes_wb from writeback_inodes_sb
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:14:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100608161458.GE11735@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100608161424.GA11735@lst.de>
When we call writeback_inodes_wb from writeback_inodes_sb we always have
s_umount held, which currently makes the whole operation a no-op.
But if we are called to write out inodes for a specific superblock we always
have s_umount held, so replace the incorrect logic checking for WB_SYNC_ALL
which only worked by coincidence with the proper check for an explicit
superblock argument.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-06-08 16:36:42.665003940 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-06-08 17:10:12.958255860 +0200
@@ -518,39 +518,19 @@ select_queue:
return ret;
}
-static void unpin_sb_for_writeback(struct super_block *sb)
-{
- up_read(&sb->s_umount);
- put_super(sb);
-}
-
-enum sb_pin_state {
- SB_PINNED,
- SB_NOT_PINNED,
- SB_PIN_FAILED
-};
-
/*
- * For WB_SYNC_NONE writeback, the caller does not have the sb pinned
+ * For background writeback the caller does not have the sb pinned
* before calling writeback. So make sure that we do pin it, so it doesn't
* go away while we are writing inodes from it.
*/
-static enum sb_pin_state pin_sb_for_writeback(struct writeback_control *wbc,
- struct super_block *sb)
+static bool pin_sb_for_writeback(struct super_block *sb)
{
- /*
- * Caller must already hold the ref for this
- */
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) {
- WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
- return SB_NOT_PINNED;
- }
spin_lock(&sb_lock);
sb->s_count++;
if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
if (sb->s_root) {
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
- return SB_PINNED;
+ return true;
}
/*
* umounted, drop rwsem again and fall through to failure
@@ -559,7 +539,7 @@ static enum sb_pin_state pin_sb_for_writ
}
sb->s_count--;
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
- return SB_PIN_FAILED;
+ return false;
}
/*
@@ -638,24 +618,29 @@ static void writeback_inodes_wb(struct b
struct inode *inode = list_entry(wb->b_io.prev,
struct inode, i_list);
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
- enum sb_pin_state state;
- if (wbc->sb && sb != wbc->sb) {
- /* super block given and doesn't
- match, skip this inode */
- redirty_tail(inode);
- continue;
- }
- state = pin_sb_for_writeback(wbc, sb);
-
- if (state == SB_PIN_FAILED) {
- requeue_io(inode);
- continue;
+ if (wbc->sb) {
+ /*
+ * We are requested to write out inodes for a specific
+ * superblock. This means we already have s_umount
+ * taken by the caller which also waits for us to
+ * complete the writeout.
+ */
+ if (sb != wbc->sb) {
+ redirty_tail(inode);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
+
+ ret = writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, wbc);
+ } else {
+ if (!pin_sb_for_writeback(sb))
+ continue;
+ ret = writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, wbc);
+ drop_super(sb);
}
- ret = writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, wbc);
- if (state == SB_PINNED)
- unpin_sb_for_writeback(sb);
if (ret)
break;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 16:14 [PATCH 0/6] writeback fixes - slow unmount and others Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-08 16:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] writeback: fix writeback completion notifications Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-08 19:50 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-15 17:25 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-15 17:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-08 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] writeback: queue work on stack in writeback_inodes_sb Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-08 19:51 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-08 16:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] writeback: enforce s_umount locking " Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 17:54 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-15 17:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 18:04 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-08 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-06-08 19:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] writeback: fix writeback_inodes_wb from writeback_inodes_sb Jens Axboe
2010-06-09 12:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-09 12:29 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-08 16:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] writeback: simplify wakeup_flusher_threads Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-08 19:51 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-08 16:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] writeback: simplify and split bdi_start_writeback Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-08 19:52 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100608161458.GE11735@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).