From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: lsf10-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [topic proposal] dealing with ->d_revalidate() right ways (automounting, atomic opens and the whole mess around that)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 03:19:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100609021940.GW31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
That's going to be the next big change of VFS architecture; bits
and pieces had been discussed on lists and in private mail, but it would
be really useful to sit down and discuss that face to face with everyone
involved.
* ->follow_link() is abused for triggering submounts.
* ->d_revalidate() is abused in many, _many_ ways, including
autofs, NFS "reval_dot" stuff, atomic opens, etc. Moreover, it has nasty
interplay with crossing mountpoints.
* NFS handling of atomic opens is near the point where we can
switch to methods that would get proper arguments directly, rather
than abusing ->lookup/->d_revalidate/whatnot. Again, ->d_revalidate
and mountpoint crossing are stumbling blocks. And NFS4 bits around
open are just plain scary...
* NFSv4 has rather unpleasant stuff in submount handling - what
it does with ->mnt_devname doesn't bear describing in polite company and
it actually doesn't work right with mount --bind (moderately) and
mountinfo contents (completely). Both issues are fixable and that gets
entangled into the aforementioned ball of barbed wire...
Who might want to be there: nfsd/nfs/cifs/afs/autofs4 and general
VFS-interested folks.
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-09 2:19 Al Viro [this message]
2010-06-09 2:29 ` [topic proposal] dealing with ->d_revalidate() right ways (automounting, atomic opens and the whole mess around that) Joel Becker
2010-06-14 14:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-06-21 20:54 ` Frank Mayhar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100609021940.GW31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf10-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).