From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 47/58] convert exofs to ->evict_inode() Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:02:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20100609100213.GC15403@lst.de> References: <4C0F5960.6090305@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig To: Boaz Harrosh Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:33857 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756187Ab0FIKCT (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:02:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C0F5960.6090305@panasas.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:05:36PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 06/09/2010 01:22 AM, Al Viro wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro > > Al hi. > > This patch is nice off course, but it clashes with a patch > I was intending to push to linux-next today. (For 2.6.36 kernel) > > The patch is the one to convert to the new truncate sequence: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127539189718732&w=2 > > In fact I was meaning to ask you if you could take this patch > through your tree, so Christoph could base his cleanup on this > as well. The new truncate sequence bits already are in Al's tree. And as I said a few times before life would really be a lot simpler if you just base things ontop of that. It makes the API for the file system a lot better.