From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Do not call ->writepage[s] from direct reclaim and use a_ops->writepages() where possible
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:12:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100611191232.GZ4366@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100611162912.GC24707@infradead.org>
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:29:12PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:28:14AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > - we also need to care about ->releasepage. At least for XFS it
> > > can end up in the same deep allocator chain as ->writepage because
> > > it does all the extent state conversions, even if it doesn't
> > > start I/O.
> >
> > Dang.
> >
> > > I haven't managed yet to decode the ext4/btrfs codepaths
> > > for ->releasepage yet to figure out how they release a page that
> > > covers a delayed allocated or unwritten range.
> > >
> >
> > If ext4/btrfs are also very deep call-chains and this series is going more
> > or less the right direction, then avoiding calling ->releasepage from direct
> > reclaim is one, somewhat unfortunate, option. The second is to avoid it on
> > a per-filesystem basis for direct reclaim using PF_MEMALLOC to detect
> > reclaimers and PF_KSWAPD to tell the difference between direct
> > reclaimers and kswapd.
>
> I went throught this a bit more and I can't actually hit that code in
> XFS ->releasepage anymore. I've also audited the caller and can't see
> how we could theoretically hit it anymore. Do the VM gurus know a case
> where we would call ->releasepage on a page that's actually dirty and
> hasn't been through block_invalidatepage before?
Which part of xfs releasepage are you trying to avoid?
dirty = xfs_page_state_convert(inode, page, &wbc, 0, 0);
if (dirty == 0 && !unwritten)
goto free_buffers;
I'd expect the above was fixed by page_mkwrite, which should be dealing
with all the funny corners that we used to have to mess with in
releasepage.
btrfs_release_page does no allocations, it only checks to see if the
page is busy somehow (dirty/writeback etc).
-chris
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-11 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 9:02 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Do not call ->writepage[s] from direct reclaim and use a_ops->writepages() where possible Mel Gorman
2010-06-08 9:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] tracing, vmscan: Add trace events for kswapd wakeup, sleeping and direct reclaim Mel Gorman
2010-06-08 9:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] tracing, vmscan: Add trace events for LRU page isolation Mel Gorman
2010-06-08 9:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] tracing, vmscan: Add trace event when a page is written Mel Gorman
2010-06-08 9:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] tracing, vmscan: Add a postprocessing script for reclaim-related ftrace events Mel Gorman
2010-06-08 9:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] vmscan: Write out ranges of pages contiguous to the inode where possible Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 6:10 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-11 12:49 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 19:07 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-11 20:44 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-12 0:17 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-08 9:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] vmscan: Do not writeback pages in direct reclaim Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 6:17 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-11 12:54 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-11 17:43 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-11 17:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-11 18:13 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-08 9:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Do not call ->writepage[s] from direct reclaim and use a_ops->writepages() where possible Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-08 9:28 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 16:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-11 18:15 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 19:12 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2010-06-09 2:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-09 9:52 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-10 0:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-10 1:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-10 1:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-11 5:57 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-11 12:33 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-11 16:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-11 18:17 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-15 14:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 14:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 15:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 15:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 16:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 16:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 16:49 ` Rik van Riel
2010-06-15 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 19:13 ` Rik van Riel
2010-06-15 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 19:44 ` Chris Mason
2010-06-16 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-16 16:59 ` Rik van Riel
2010-06-16 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 16:54 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-15 15:38 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-15 16:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 16:30 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-15 16:34 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-15 16:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 16:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 16:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-06-15 17:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 14:51 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-15 14:55 ` Rik van Riel
2010-06-15 15:08 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-15 15:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-06-15 16:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100611191232.GZ4366@think.oraclecorp.com \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).