From: npiggin@suse.de
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
Subject: [patch 37/52] fs: icache lazy lru
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:02:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100624030731.563540438@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100624030212.676457061@suse.de
[-- Attachment #1: fs-inode_lock-scale-10.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 11026 bytes --]
Impelemnt lazy inode lru similarly to dcache. This will reduce lock
acquisition and will help to improve lock ordering subsequently.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 21 +++++++--------
fs/inode.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
include/linux/fs.h | 7 ++++-
include/linux/writeback.h | 1
4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/inode.c
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ static unsigned int i_hash_shift __read_
* allowing for low-overhead inode sync() operations.
*/
-LIST_HEAD(inode_in_use);
LIST_HEAD(inode_unused);
struct inode_hash_bucket {
@@ -298,6 +297,7 @@ void inode_init_once(struct inode *inode
INIT_HLIST_BL_NODE(&inode->i_hash);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_dentry);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_devices);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_list);
INIT_RADIX_TREE(&inode->i_data.page_tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
spin_lock_init(&inode->i_data.tree_lock);
spin_lock_init(&inode->i_data.i_mmap_lock);
@@ -323,25 +323,6 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
inode_init_once(inode);
}
-/*
- * inode_lock must be held
- */
-void __iget(struct inode *inode)
-{
- assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
-
- inode->i_count++;
- if (inode->i_count > 1)
- return;
-
- if (!(inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY|I_SYNC))) {
- spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_in_use);
- spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- }
- atomic_dec(&inodes_stat.nr_unused);
-}
-
/**
* clear_inode - clear an inode
* @inode: inode to clear
@@ -384,7 +365,7 @@ static void dispose_list(struct list_hea
struct inode *inode;
inode = list_first_entry(head, struct inode, i_list);
- list_del(&inode->i_list);
+ list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
@@ -437,11 +418,12 @@ static int invalidate_list(struct list_h
invalidate_inode_buffers(inode);
if (!inode->i_count) {
spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- list_move(&inode->i_list, dispose);
+ list_del(&inode->i_list);
spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_NEW);
inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ list_add(&inode->i_list, dispose);
count++;
continue;
}
@@ -480,19 +462,6 @@ int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_inodes);
-static int can_unuse(struct inode *inode)
-{
- if (inode->i_state)
- return 0;
- if (inode_has_buffers(inode))
- return 0;
- if (inode->i_count)
- return 0;
- if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
- return 0;
- return 1;
-}
-
/*
* Scan `goal' inodes on the unused list for freeable ones. They are moved to
* a temporary list and then are freed outside inode_lock by dispose_list().
@@ -510,13 +479,12 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
{
LIST_HEAD(freeable);
int nr_pruned = 0;
- int nr_scanned;
unsigned long reap = 0;
down_read(&iprune_sem);
again:
spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- for (nr_scanned = 0; nr_scanned < nr_to_scan; nr_scanned++) {
+ for (; nr_to_scan; nr_to_scan--) {
struct inode *inode;
if (list_empty(&inode_unused))
@@ -528,33 +496,30 @@ again:
spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
goto again;
}
- if (inode->i_state || inode->i_count) {
+ if (inode->i_count || (inode->i_state & ~I_REFERENCED)) {
+ list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ atomic_dec(&inodes_stat.nr_unused);
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (inode->i_state) {
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_unused);
+ inode->i_state &= ~I_REFERENCED;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
continue;
}
if (inode_has_buffers(inode) || inode->i_data.nrpages) {
+ list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_unused);
spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
__iget(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+
if (remove_inode_buffers(inode))
reap += invalidate_mapping_pages(&inode->i_data,
0, -1);
iput(inode);
-again2:
spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
-
- if (inode != list_entry(inode_unused.next,
- struct inode, i_list))
- continue; /* wrong inode or list_empty */
- if (!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock)) {
- spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- goto again2;
- }
- if (!can_unuse(inode)) {
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- continue;
- }
+ continue;
}
list_move(&inode->i_list, &freeable);
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_NEW);
@@ -694,9 +659,6 @@ __inode_add_to_lists(struct super_block
atomic_inc(&inodes_stat.nr_inodes);
list_add(&inode->i_sb_list, &sb->s_inodes);
spin_unlock(&sb_inode_list_lock);
- spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- list_add(&inode->i_list, &inode_in_use);
- spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
if (b) {
spin_lock_bucket(b);
hlist_bl_add_head(&inode->i_hash, &b->head);
@@ -1343,9 +1305,13 @@ void generic_delete_inode(struct inode *
{
const struct super_operations *op = inode->i_sb->s_op;
- spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
- spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
+ if (!list_empty(&inode->i_list)) {
+ spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
+ list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
+ spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
+ if (!inode->i_state)
+ atomic_dec(&inodes_stat.nr_unused);
+ }
list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list);
spin_unlock(&sb_inode_list_lock);
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_NEW);
@@ -1393,13 +1359,15 @@ int generic_detach_inode(struct inode *i
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
if (!hlist_bl_unhashed(&inode->i_hash)) {
- if (!(inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY|I_SYNC))) {
- spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_unused);
- spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- }
- atomic_inc(&inodes_stat.nr_unused);
if (sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE) {
+ inode->i_state |= I_REFERENCED;
+ if (!(inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY|I_SYNC)) &&
+ list_empty(&inode->i_list)) {
+ spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
+ list_add(&inode->i_list, &inode_unused);
+ spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
+ atomic_inc(&inodes_stat.nr_unused);
+ }
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_unlock(&sb_inode_list_lock);
return 0;
@@ -1414,11 +1382,14 @@ int generic_detach_inode(struct inode *i
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_NEW);
inode->i_state &= ~I_WILL_FREE;
__remove_inode_hash(inode);
- atomic_dec(&inodes_stat.nr_unused);
}
- spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
- list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
- spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
+ if (!list_empty(&inode->i_list)) {
+ spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
+ list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
+ spin_unlock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
+ if (!inode->i_state)
+ atomic_dec(&inodes_stat.nr_unused);
+ }
list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list);
spin_unlock(&sb_inode_list_lock);
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_NEW);
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1634,16 +1634,17 @@ struct super_operations {
*
* Q: What is the difference between I_WILL_FREE and I_FREEING?
*/
-#define I_DIRTY_SYNC 1
-#define I_DIRTY_DATASYNC 2
-#define I_DIRTY_PAGES 4
+#define I_DIRTY_SYNC 0x01
+#define I_DIRTY_DATASYNC 0x02
+#define I_DIRTY_PAGES 0x04
#define __I_NEW 3
#define I_NEW (1 << __I_NEW)
-#define I_WILL_FREE 16
-#define I_FREEING 32
-#define I_CLEAR 64
+#define I_WILL_FREE 0x10
+#define I_FREEING 0x20
+#define I_CLEAR 0x40
#define __I_SYNC 7
#define I_SYNC (1 << __I_SYNC)
+#define I_REFERENCED 0x100
#define I_DIRTY (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC | I_DIRTY_PAGES)
@@ -2171,7 +2172,6 @@ extern int insert_inode_locked4(struct i
extern int insert_inode_locked(struct inode *);
extern void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *);
-extern void __iget(struct inode * inode);
extern void iget_failed(struct inode *);
extern void clear_inode(struct inode *);
extern void destroy_inode(struct inode *);
@@ -2422,6 +2422,12 @@ extern int generic_show_options(struct s
extern void save_mount_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options);
extern void replace_mount_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options);
+static inline void __iget(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
+ inode->i_count++;
+}
+
static inline ino_t parent_ino(struct dentry *dentry)
{
ino_t res;
Index: linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -552,15 +552,8 @@ select_queue:
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
redirty_tail(inode);
}
- } else if (inode->i_count) {
- /*
- * The inode is clean, inuse
- */
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_in_use);
} else {
- /*
- * The inode is clean, unused
- */
+ /* The inode is clean */
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_unused);
}
}
@@ -1206,8 +1199,6 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_
*/
WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
- spin_lock(&sb_inode_list_lock);
-
/*
* Data integrity sync. Must wait for all pages under writeback,
* because there may have been pages dirtied before our sync
@@ -1215,7 +1206,8 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_
* In which case, the inode may not be on the dirty list, but
* we still have to wait for that writeout.
*/
- list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
struct address_space *mapping;
mapping = inode->i_mapping;
@@ -1229,13 +1221,13 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_
}
__iget(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- spin_unlock(&sb_inode_list_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* We hold a reference to 'inode' so it couldn't have been
- * removed from s_inodes list while we dropped the
- * sb_inode_list_lock. We cannot iput the inode now as we can
- * be holding the last reference and we cannot iput it under
- * spinlock. So we keep the reference and iput it later.
+ * removed from s_inodes list while we dropped the i_lock. We
+ * cannot iput the inode now as we can be holding the last
+ * reference and we cannot iput it under spinlock. So we keep
+ * the reference and iput it later.
*/
iput(old_inode);
old_inode = inode;
@@ -1244,9 +1236,9 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_
cond_resched();
- spin_lock(&sb_inode_list_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
}
- spin_unlock(&sb_inode_list_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
iput(old_inode);
}
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/writeback.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ struct backing_dev_info;
extern spinlock_t sb_inode_list_lock;
extern spinlock_t wb_inode_list_lock;
-extern struct list_head inode_in_use;
extern struct list_head inode_unused;
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-24 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 153+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-24 3:02 [patch 00/52] vfs scalability patches updated npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 01/52] kernel: add bl_list npiggin
2010-06-24 6:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-24 14:42 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 16:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-28 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-29 6:30 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 02/52] fs: fix superblock iteration race npiggin
2010-06-29 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-29 14:56 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-29 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-29 17:41 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-29 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-29 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-29 20:04 ` Chris Clayton
2010-06-29 20:14 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-29 20:38 ` Chris Clayton
2010-06-30 7:13 ` Chris Clayton
2010-06-30 12:51 ` Al Viro
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 03/52] fs: fs_struct rwlock to spinlock npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 04/52] fs: cleanup files_lock npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 05/52] lglock: introduce special lglock and brlock spin locks npiggin
2010-06-24 18:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-06-25 6:22 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-25 9:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-06-25 10:11 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 06/52] fs: scale files_lock npiggin
2010-06-24 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 15:00 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 07/52] fs: brlock vfsmount_lock npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 08/52] fs: scale mntget/mntput npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 09/52] fs: dcache scale hash npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 10/52] fs: dcache scale lru npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 11/52] fs: dcache scale nr_dentry npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 12/52] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 13/52] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 14/52] fs: dcache scale subdirs npiggin
2010-06-24 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 9:50 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-24 15:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 15/52] fs: dcache scale inode alias list npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 16/52] fs: dcache RCU for multi-step operaitons npiggin
2010-06-24 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 15:03 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 17:22 ` john stultz
2010-06-24 17:26 ` john stultz
2010-06-25 6:45 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 17/52] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 18/52] fs: dcache reduce dput locking npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 19/52] fs: dcache per-bucket dcache hash locking npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 20/52] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 21/52] fs: dcache per-inode inode alias locking npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 22/52] fs: dcache rationalise dget variants npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 23/52] fs: dcache percpu nr_dentry npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 24/52] fs: dcache reduce d_parent locking npiggin
2010-06-24 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 15:07 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 15:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-24 16:05 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-28 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-07-07 14:35 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 25/52] fs: dcache DCACHE_REFERENCED improve npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 26/52] fs: icache lock s_inodes list npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 27/52] fs: icache lock inode hash npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 28/52] fs: icache lock i_state npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 29/52] fs: icache lock i_count npiggin
2010-06-30 7:27 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 12:05 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 2:36 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-01 7:54 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 9:36 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 16:21 ` Frank Mayhar
2010-07-03 2:03 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-03 3:41 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-03 4:31 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-03 5:06 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-03 5:18 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-05 22:41 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-06 4:34 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-06 10:38 ` Theodore Tso
2010-07-06 13:04 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-07 17:00 ` Frank Mayhar
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 30/52] fs: icache lock lru/writeback lists npiggin
2010-06-24 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 15:09 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 31/52] fs: icache atomic inodes_stat npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 32/52] fs: icache protect inode state npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 33/52] fs: icache atomic last_ino, iunique lock npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 34/52] fs: icache remove inode_lock npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 35/52] fs: icache factor hash lock into functions npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 36/52] fs: icache per-bucket inode hash locks npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` npiggin [this message]
2010-06-24 9:52 ` [patch 37/52] fs: icache lazy lru Andi Kleen
2010-06-24 15:59 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-30 8:38 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 12:06 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 2:46 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-01 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 38/52] fs: icache RCU free inodes npiggin
2010-06-30 8:57 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 12:07 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 39/52] fs: icache rcu walk for i_sb_list npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 40/52] fs: dcache improve scalability of pseudo filesystems npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 41/52] fs: icache reduce atomics npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 42/52] fs: icache per-cpu last_ino allocator npiggin
2010-06-24 9:48 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-24 15:52 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 16:19 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-24 16:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 43/52] fs: icache per-cpu nr_inodes counter npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 44/52] fs: icache per-CPU sb inode lists and locks npiggin
2010-06-30 9:26 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 12:08 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 3:12 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-01 8:00 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 45/52] fs: icache RCU hash lookups npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 46/52] fs: icache reduce locking npiggin
2010-06-24 3:02 ` [patch 47/52] fs: keep inode with backing-dev npiggin
2010-06-24 3:03 ` [patch 48/52] fs: icache split IO and LRU lists npiggin
2010-06-24 3:03 ` [patch 49/52] fs: icache scale writeback list locking npiggin
2010-06-24 3:03 ` [patch 50/52] mm: implement per-zone shrinker npiggin
2010-06-24 10:06 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-24 16:00 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 16:27 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-24 16:32 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-24 16:37 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-30 6:28 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 12:03 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:03 ` [patch 51/52] fs: per-zone dentry and inode LRU npiggin
2010-06-30 10:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 12:13 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 3:03 ` [patch 52/52] fs: icache less I_FREEING time npiggin
2010-06-30 10:13 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 12:14 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 3:33 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-01 8:06 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-25 7:12 ` [patch 00/52] vfs scalability patches updated Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-25 8:05 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-30 11:30 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 12:40 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-30 17:09 ` Frank Mayhar
2010-07-01 3:56 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-01 8:20 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 17:36 ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-01 17:23 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 17:28 ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-06 17:49 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-01 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-01 17:52 ` Nick Piggin
2010-07-02 4:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-30 17:08 ` Frank Mayhar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100624030731.563540438@suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=fmayhar@google.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).