From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add f_flags to struct statfs(64)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:56:53 +1000
Message-ID: <20100626095652.GI29809@laptop>
References: <20100626093507.GB26371@lst.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, drepper@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38644 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753192Ab0FZJ45 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:56:57 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100626093507.GB26371@lst.de>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a flags field to help glibc implementing statvfs(3) efficiently.
> 
> We copy the flag values from glibc, and add a new ST_VALID flag to
> denote that f_flags is implemented.

Thanks.

Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

Is f_favail important enough to add as well?