From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add f_flags to struct statfs(64)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:20:27 +0200
Message-ID: <20100627092027.GA11589@lst.de>
References: <20100626093507.GB26371@lst.de> <4C2703EC.7050001@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	drepper@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:35762 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752701Ab0F0JUq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 27 Jun 2010 05:20:46 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C2703EC.7050001@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 03:55:24PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> >+	__u32 f_flags[5];
> >  	__u32 f_spare[5];
> >  } ARCH_PACK_COMPAT_STATFS64;
> This is a typo?

Yes, it is.