From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] simplify writeback thread creation Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:51:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20100709145150.GA5891@lst.de> References: <20100707225242.GA28802@lst.de> <4C35C292.9020507@kernel.dk> <1278598877.20321.34.camel@localhost> <4C35E7D5.8020809@kernel.dk> <1278602632.9953.4.camel@localhost> <4C360998.9040609@kernel.dk> <1278614602.7365.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100708184811.GA17593@lst.de> <1278661979.9953.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Artem Bityutskiy Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:36092 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755991Ab0GIOvx (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:51:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1278661979.9953.8.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 10:52:59AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > But what about cases like 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda4'? They also > involve dirty data write-back. But only on the bdev fs inode.