From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:52:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20100712025247.GA16784@infradead.org> References: <1274777588-21494-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20100702121304.GA10075@infradead.org> <20100712024104.GD25335@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100712024104.GD25335@dastard> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a > context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e. the > original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which > combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst > retaining the stability of the courrent code.... That approach sounds good to me. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org