From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Upstream tree for OMFS?
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:44:35 -0700
Message-ID: <20100712104435.2ca47c0a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <AANLkTilI-GLcmJjC5n2aT-0ywdOK0M5VGSUdEGYXa3VJ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilI-GLcmJjC5n2aT-0ywdOK0M5VGSUdEGYXa3VJ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:49:01 -0400 Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:

> Hello fs devs,
> 
> I have a few patches to send on to -next for OMFS
> and I finally got around to setting up a git tree for
> it.  Previously I sent things through akpm or the
> trivial tree.
> 
> I doubt anyone but me cares too much about this FS
> but I thought I'd ask first if anyone wants to be the
> upstream instead of me sending pull requests directly
> to Linus.  Of course I'll post patches here for
> review in either case.

Please ask Stephen to include the tree in the linux-next lineup.