From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valerie Aurora Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/38] union-mount: Support for mounting union mount file systems Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:02:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20100716210226.GD21201@shell> References: <1276627208-17242-1-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1276627208-17242-22-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <20100713044701.GF3949@zeus.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Viro , Miklos Szeredi , Jan Blunck , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Ian Kent Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100713044701.GF3949@zeus.themaw.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:47:02PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Valerie Aurora wrote: > > + > > +static int > > +check_mnt_union(struct path *mntpnt, struct vfsmount *topmost_mnt, int mnt_flags) > > +{ > > + struct vfsmount *lower_mnt = mntpnt->mnt; > > + > > + if (!(mnt_flags & MNT_UNION)) > > + return 0; > > + > > +#ifndef CONFIG_UNION_MOUNT > > + return -EINVAL; > > +#endif > > + if (!(lower_mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) > > + return -EBUSY; > > + > > + if (!list_empty(&lower_mnt->mnt_mounts)) > > + return -EBUSY; > > + > > + if (!IS_ROOT(mntpnt->dentry)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (mnt_flags & MNT_READONLY) > > + return -EROFS; > > + > > + if (!(topmost_mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & MS_WHITEOUT)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > Is there a need to check fallthru, umm ... that probably doesn't > apply for the ROOT(), right? Actually, that's on my todo list - right now I'm assuming MS_WHITEOUT implies fallthru support as well. But it doesn't. We're a little short on MS_* flags. I'm thinking of just checking ->whiteout and ->fallthru for non-NULL on the root dir and getting rid of MS_WHITEOUT entirely. Thoughts? -VAL