From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 11/11] writeback: prevent unnecessary bdi threads wakeups Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:00:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20100722090023.GA7692@infradead.org> References: <1279704706-1267-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <1279704706-1267-12-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <1279712741.2306.36.camel@localhost> <20100722004155.GZ32635@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , Dave Chinner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:41012 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754649Ab0GVJAh (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:00:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100722004155.GZ32635@dastard> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:41:55AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > if (wakeup_bdi) { > trace_writeback_wakeup(bdi) > spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock); > if (!bdi->wb.task) {{ > trace_writeback_wakeup_nothread(bdi); > wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task); > } else > wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task); > spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock); That gives us duplicate traces for the first case, what about: if (wakeup_bdi) { spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock); if (bdi->wb.task) { trace_writeback_wake_thread(bdi); wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task); } else { trace_writeback_wake_forker_thread(bdi); wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task); } spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock); }